As soon as I saw this thread I went ahead and checked all of you guy's latest threads to see myself what is it that you're complaining about. And I will say that I understand you to an extent yet I feel like you exaggerating a bit, trying to cause a discussion where there has been no confrontation. The words you're using are rather explosive and your statements are generalizing java forum users, even if you make a disclaimer at the end of your thread. You can't make a thread literally titled
Java Players Please Leave us Alone and they say it isn't directed to everyone but specific people. Be coherent with what you're stating. Now about the threads:
In
@RelatedNoobs' thread history I found the following which I think are worth pointing out:
Interestingly enough the only person who rejected this idea was a Bedrock player. All java players who replied were supportive of your idea, and understanding of the situation even if they had never experienced it themselves, and you even had a response from Rubik himself at the end of your thread. so in this case, no are not
A few java users replied, all of them supportive of your idea
once again and understanded the situation even if they had never experienced it before, or hadn't been affected by it too much. The only person who didn't agree was even kind enough to link you to a support article that could potentially help you with the shadow mute. I once again don't see how Java Players ruined this thread or degraded it because of being "ignorant".
Basically everyone who replied agreed, but one person.
A bedrock player. Don't think I have to elaborate on this one.
Okay here's the first situation I can quasi-agree with you in. The person who replied said this should be added to Java first rather than bedrock providing no reasoning behind it. And I understand how that can could bother you since theoretically Bedrock and Java should be at the same priority level (or perhaps Bedrock should be more important because of its greater playerbase). But here's where I notice something, he replied back and you never did. You want to get your ideas across yet you abandon them as soon as they get rejected.
Everyone agreed, thread got escalated and even forwarded to the Community Manager. Java players agreed as well, take this reply as an example: That person doesn't play Bedrock yet they agree it there should be community events on there as well. Java Players being nice and understanding?
Ok a Java Player replied and disagreed with the suggestion, his replies were well detailed and well informed. He might have disagreed but you can't deny he didn't hold no "ignorant" position.
Lots of people agreed, one disagreed can't tell if they're from Bedrock or Java though. Doesn't matter, their opinion wasn't "ignorant" as well was it?
Most people disagreed, you got yourself some really well structured replies, that evidently had some effort put in. You replied to my reply, and other people disagreed with you. Don't think deeming a reply that got
19 likes as "ignorant" makes much sense. After a while you asked the thread to be removed. And now I ask, is this how you want progress for your own Network? If you don't allow the conversations to keep going?
Now
@nrss's threads:
Didn't get much attention alright, not the Java Player's fault. But everyone who replied to it agreed.
Quetzi, who at the moment was part of the CubeCraft Management replied, and explained why this couldn't be implemented/fixed. Don't think the admins are ignorant about their own server.
Woop, 15 likes. [Everyone Liked That] although it was mostly Java Players who replied, they all understood what you meant and agreed with it.
Okay yes, a few Java Players got confused about you saying there were villagers in SkyWars, they didn't know you meant Bedrock. But mistakes happen, I wouldn't necessarily portray that as ignorant, just a common human mistake. Regardless some people did agree, and some people helped explain the others that you meant Bedrock. The "issue" isn't really being degraded when it's about a mistake, not reading the tag next to the thread. I know it can be annoying but... it wasn't intentional.
Great everyone agreed, no Java Player disrupted the peace of this piece of internet!
Didn't get much attention sadly, but no Java Player went ahead and posted ignorent comments about it.
Okay in this one I can semi-understand what you're complaining about. With the person who linked you to the reports website.
Especially since you said in the thread that you had already reported all bugs you had come across. To me, these kind of suggestions asking for progress, and stuff to be fixed are extremely important since they serve as a way to demand gameplay quality, being just a normal community member. What I disagree with is your reaction to this person linking you to the report site, no need to be so aggresive. It once agains feels like you are the one trying to spark conflict where there is none.
And at last,
@GHSpaghetti's threads:
One person agreed, a Java User got confused at first but was quick to fix his mistake. Nothing degrading in his actions I would say.
The reply you got from a Staff Member isn't unique to Bedrock complaint threads, it happens to Java too. I'll agree with your position on this one, I really don't like and I've made threads about it myself, that players who complain about the anticheat are told to record and report. It's a really dumb thing to do in my opinion, I want to borrow a fragment from a thread of mine that perfectly summarizes how non-sensical telling people to report sounds:
Agreed with you on this one, but once again it's not a Bedrock issue. It's a CubeCraft issue.
Got refuted, by a Mod. With really concised reasoning, you even agreed with it. So I'm gonna go ahead and guess this particular Bedrock Issue wasn't degraded by Java Players.
Agree with you, perhaps the reply you got was misinformed. This must be a Bedrock only issue. But you didn't care to let them know they were wrong so...
I can see how stuff like having your inventory filled with items you don't need is a Bedrock mainly issue. And it's noticeable the people who replied, yes Java Players. Weren't aware of this and hence, they did in fact deliver ignorant replies. But then we go back to the same thing that happened with your last thread, if they're being ignorant of Bedrock's issues, you never let them know?
Having all of this in mind, having checked all of your threads and left my thoughts on most of them. I will conclude something, Java Players Degrading legitimate Bedrock Issues is a lie. It may have happened in a couple of threads, from the many I listed on this reply. Some of your suggestions got answers from Management/Admins themselves, some got really high amounts of likes, escalations and praised by many community members, so you can be certain that those issues didn't go unperceived. It seems to me that in most of the cases you abandon your threads mid-discussion. You're blaming the Java Players for degrading your ideas when it's you that don't fight for them to be understood and recognized. If you're looking for progress, put some effort yourselves. I reiterate what I said on the first paragraph of this reply, this thread is mostly explosive written with no other motivation than frustration, and frustration is sometimes understandable, but I don't see that being the excuse in this case. I would advise you to not continue to blame Java Players for your ideas not being listened.
In simpler words,
no are not