Java Blockwars: -players +blocks

[Jevmen]

Depending of how many more members have the enemy team all the mates of your team will get the exact same amount of blocks all the missing players should have had distributed between all your members. same with enemies.

Spoiler: examples

Lets gess each player have 1 stack of blocks
5 V 7 --> +2stacks/5 players = 25 extra blocks per mate
3 V 6 --> +3stacks/3 players = 64 extra blocks per mate
3 V 8 --> +5stacks/3 players = 106 extra blocks per mate

this will be realy usefull because you dont only have to deal with less mates, also you have less defence.
this will help to make the game more fair, because both teams will have the exact amount of blocks to break.
for 8 players is not hard to break the blocks of 3 players
and 3 players cant break the blocks of 8 players, this will be some balance with the problems of teams with less players

 

[_The13thDoctor_]

Depending of how many more members have the enemy team all the mates of your team will get the exact same amount of blocks all the missing players should have had distributed between all your members. same with enemies.

Spoiler: examples

Lets gess each player have 1 stack of blocks
5 V 7 --> +2stacks/5 players = 25 extra blocks per mate
3 V 6 --> +3stacks/3 players = 64 extra blocks per mate
3 V 8 --> +5stacks/3 players = 106 extra blocks per mate

this will be realy usefull because you dont only have to deal with less mates, also you have less defence.
this will help to make the game more fair, because both teams will have the exact amount of blocks to break.
for 8 players is not hard to break the blocks of 3 players
and 3 players cant break the blocks of 8 players, this will be some balance with the problems of teams with less players

Yes, this would be fair and make the game more balanced when this happens! +1

 

[Andyyy]

In all honesty, I've thought about this a lot before and it doesn't do much because most players are lost during the game and not before it. Plus the extra blocks arent really that useful. Maybe blocks could be given to players during the fight phase instead?

 

[Jevmen]

In all honesty, I've thought about this a lot before and it doesn't do much because most players are lost during the game and not before it. Plus the extra blocks arent really that useful. Maybe blocks could be given to players during the fight phase instead?

how is your idea exaclty?
like a refill each X time?
or
the players have that blocks during the fight phase permanently and they can place the blocks when they want?

 

[Andyyy]

how is your idea exaclty?
like a refill each X time?
or
the players have that blocks during the fight phase permanently and they can place the blocks when they want?

Maybe just everyone gets 3 blocks when someone leaves after build phase, except overtime?

 

[Jevmen]

Maybe just everyone gets 3 blocks when someone leaves after build phase, except overtime?

and what if your team start with less players from the begining?

 

[Andyyy]

and what if your team start with less players from the begining?

Nothing. There is auto balance and other balancing methods already.

 

[Jevmen]

Nothing. There is auto balance and other balancing methods already.

this is the auto balance

 

[Andyyy]

View attachment 160446
this is the auto balance

Auto balance allows 8v5 but it shouldn't allow that and be tighter. Maybe 8v7 and such.

 

[LordSidi0us]

This will makes the games with non full teams more balanced.The numbers of blocks you suggested are fair for me.I support the idea:)

 

[Oreo♥️]

Absolutely no. Yes, sure you would get the amount of blocks of your teammates, but you wouldn't receive any extra time to place those, which would result in keeping the balancing system pretty much the same as it is except that players would get more blocks that they wouldn't use.
Besides this does not help the balancing at all since this doesn't work when teammates leave in the middle of the game, which is an occurance that happens quite often.