World edit idea

[Sophie]

So, i am pretty proud of this idea c:

Basically, world edit is now only obtainable via voting. I saw this on another server. All you have to do is vote, and you get world edit for 6 hours. Donators can get the world edit for 24 hours, whilst stone ranks get 6 hours. This gives people a great reason to donate, whilst not violating the EULA. Also, it gives players a perfect reason to vote, as they get more than a only a few points for donating a day. Opinion? @halothe23
I don't see what could go wrong; players have a great reason to both, donate and vote, and we get world edit back! I mean, creative isn't exactly the most popular section of the server now, is it?
Oh wait... it's the least popular...

 

[Aimee2323]

Sounds good, but maybe make the times less since there is more than one place you can vote..

 

[Sophie]

Perhaps an hour each time for stone, or 6 hours for a donator? :)

 

[JuanCruz]

Why this doesn't violate Eula? Donors get an advantage to stones isn't it?

 

[Exciting_pancake]

Yes this is good.. creative is dead atm.

 

[Saradabaschi]

Good idea but Creative crashes a lot recently. World edit would make it worse I think...
Although I would love to have it back ;D

 

[Tacosbefriends]

It's an interesting idea. I'd definitely start voting again if it meant I got worldedit back. I think maybe 2 hours per vote would be good, but donors also get 2 hours. It's only fair (and doesn't violate EULA)

 

[Sophie]

It's an interesting idea. I'd definitely start voting again if it meant I got worldedit back. I think maybe 2 hours per vote would be good, but donors also get 2 hours. It's only fair (and doesn't violate EULA)

Wouldn't violate the EULA to give them longer, and gives people a reason to donate.

 

[MinecraftPenguin21]

yes agreed, this is an awesome idea, also i saw this on another server, i asked them if it was against eula and the owner said it does not go against eula :D.

@halothe23 your opinion on this new World edit idea?

 

[Tacosbefriends]

Wouldn't violate the EULA to give them longer, and gives people a reason to donate.

Actually if you read the EULA, there's a specific paragraph about getting the same perks but more of the perk. For instance, another server had to remove their double XP for VIP's perk because of it. Simply because everyone has access to it doesn't mean you can give donors MORE access to it. If I stop being lazy, I'll go find the EULA and copy/paste the paragraph.

 

[Sophie]

Actually if you read the EULA, there's a specific paragraph about getting the same perks but more of the perk. For instance, another server had to remove their double XP for VIP's perk because of it. Simply because everyone has access to it doesn't mean you can give donors MORE access to it. If I stop being lazy, I'll go find the EULA and copy/paste the paragraph.

There is a difference between getting more of something and getting something for longer.

 

[Tacosbefriends]

Longer=more time=more

 

[Volkom_]

There is a difference between getting more of something and getting something for longer.

Snap, donors wouldn't be able to get a longer period of time. It violates the EULA.

 

[Sophie]

Snap, donors wouldn't be able to get a longer period of time. It violates the EULA.

Oh right.. =/ The EULA actually ruins everything, why did they have to make that stupid thing -.-

 

[Gjpoppy]

So, i am pretty proud of this idea c:

Basically, world edit is now only obtainable via voting. I saw this on another server. All you have to do is vote, and you get world edit for 6 hours. Donators can get the world edit for 24 hours, whilst stone ranks get 6 hours. This gives people a great reason to donate, whilst not violating the EULA. Also, it gives players a perfect reason to vote, as they get more than a only a few points for donating a day. Opinion? @halothe23
I don't see what could go wrong; players have a great reason to both, donate and vote, and we get world edit back! I mean, creative isn't exactly the most popular section of the server now, is it?
Oh wait... it's the least popular...
View attachment 18328

Good idea but Creative crashes loads without creative at the moment, if this is to be introduced it should be once creative is stable again

 

[Tacosbefriends]

I still like the idea that voting lets you use worldedit for an hour or so. Definitely would like to see halo's and Rubik's opinions.

 

[BAD-MON]

Wait.... Isn't this violating the EULA changes? Donors having more time than the stone if we vote?


Sounds like a good plan. And why not just 4-6 hours for both donors and stone rank? (If this violates the EULA changes)

 

[OrangeGE]

Perhaps, there's a 25% chance you get 6 hours of world edit, and a 75% chance you get 3-4? Idk..

 

[Sophie]

Perhaps, there's a 25% chance you get 6 hours of world edit, and a 75% chance you get 3-4? Idk..

Would the odds be increased for donors? I mean, players have little reason to donate now..

 

[Aimee2323]

Snap, you can't give advantages to donors over stones.