Suggestion: The 'senior member/veteran member rank.'

[RockBob4]

This sounds really cool! Like you said it is a small thing to keep experienced members active and would probably recruit new ones.

 

[betty's oldies]

Looks good. Just got to see how many will get it if it does happen.

 

[BlueMoon475]

I'd like to see this implemented. It'd be nice for the old members to get a little more recognition for all the time and effort they've spent helping out others around the community. The '1 Year' minimum should be a must; It's quite easy to gain recognition in little under a month, and it would be quite unfair.

 

[Thomaser]

I disapprove this. I report players quite often. The only staff members+ who can do something with my reports should get extra tasks!!??
There would be less time for the more important stuff.

 

[CptSwollhouse]

I like it! Being a productive member of the forums is just as, if not more, important than being active on the server! Recognition for doing so would be nice. Especially for those who want to be active members without being a part of the staff! +1

 

[Spyridon Agnew Dragon]

Only problem is what about us super active people? I joined back in May but ive been more active here than some people and even some staff have been in years (add an exta 30 or so to account for player reports) also if this is put in since we cant ask for it maybe there should be an application section for this it would save time on checking EVERY forum account

 

[RynezDev]

Sounds good! :)
it will change the color of the name tag? xD

 

[Thaus]

Sounds good! :)
it will change the color of the name tag? xD

It just seems to make it a bit more wordy, like Well-Known Member rather than just member. :P

 

[RynezDev]

It just seems to make it a bit more wordy, like Well-Known Member rather than just member. :p

Lol No I mean to give the rank "Senior member" a color.. xD

 

[DrHam]

I disapprove this. I report players quite often. The only staff members+ who can do something with my reports should get extra tasks!!??
There would be less time for the more important stuff.

Totally doesn't make sense

 

[Thaus]

I disapprove this. I report players quite often. The only staff members+ who can do something with my reports should get extra tasks!!??
There would be less time for the more important stuff.

Bruh did you even read this?!?!?! LOL!

 

[Stefanvld]

I disapprove this. I report players quite often. The only staff members+ who can do something with my reports should get extra tasks!!??
There would be less time for the more important stuff.

Please read the suggestion and reconsider what you said. :3

 

[GreatLatte]

Love the idea! But I wont be getting that rank any time soon! :p +1

 

[Thomaser]

Please read the suggestion and reconsider what you said. :3

What are you aiming for that I should take in reconsideration? I read your suggestion another 2 times but I cannot find anything that would undermine my disapproval..

 

[Buuuddy]

What are you aiming for that I should take in reconsideration? I read your suggestion another 2 times but I cannot find anything that would undermine my disapproval..

There aren't that many active members that have been around for 1 year+. Also, this wouldn't take long at all. Two or three clicks and your rank has been set. ;)

 

[Thomaser]

There aren't that many active members that have been around for 1 year+. Also, this wouldn't take long at all. Two or three clicks and your rank has been set. ;)

Thanks for explanation @Boooddy ! :)

I know something about forums and I thought there was a option in Xenforo (Idk if this is made with Xenforo, but it is likely) that someone will be promoted on the forum when he/she has obtained something. You might want to use this option too..

 

[Buuuddy]

I know something about forums and I thought there was a option in Xenforo (Idk if this is made with Xenforo, but it is likely) that someone will be promoted on the forum when he/she has obtained something. You might want to use this option too..

Stefan has written that you do not need a certain amount of messages or likes, as that would cause message- and likefarming. I agree on what he said and staff should decide whether a member is well-known in a good way or not. ;)

 

[Thomaser]

Stefan has written that you do not need a certain amount of messages or likes, as that would cause message- and likefarming. I agree on what he said and staff should decide whether a member is well-known in a good way or not. ;)

I left my message and will stop arguing now, if you all think it's a good idea, i won't oppose. xD
As Geertje always says: Genoeg is Genoeg

 

[Stefanvld]

@Thomaser We'd only check someone's profile if we see activity on the forums as in replies to threads for example, this will take around 10-30 minutes max a week. It won't be very time-consuming. :)

I left my message and will stop arguing now, if you all think it's a good idea, i won't oppose. xD

We're not arguing, we're discussing the suggestion. Feel free to continue. :)

 

[Thomaser]

@Thomaser We'd only check someone's profile if we see activity on the forums as in replies to threads for example, this will take around 10-30 minutes max a week. It won't be very time-consuming. :)


We're not arguing, we're discussing the suggestion. Feel free to continue. :)

You guys all totally convinced me ;)