Minecraft PC IP: play.cubecraft.net

Should this be added (Read whole thread)(Multiple Votes)

  • Yes

  • No (Explain why)

  • I have changes that I would like to suggest


Results are only viewable after voting.
D

Deleted member 529794

Guest
I think that things should stay as they are because, it would use up alot of hassle for just a few players. (maybe I'm wrong though, please correct me if i am)
 

Ferrcho

Well-Known Member
Jun 24, 2019
946
849
149
18
Spain
I think that things should stay as they are because, it would use up alot of hassle for just a few players. (maybe I'm wrong though, please correct me if i am)

No, you're not wrong, you're right, as I said before versions 1.8 and 1.9 are totally different
 

Technosword

Forum Expert
Apr 21, 2020
1,761
3,734
289
US
Just remembered this thread, going to respond to a few messages, I don’t
Of course, it's a good thing there's one person who realizes and stops to think how absurd it would be
This is not how it is done. The shield acts as blocking and it works the same as blocking, just without the blocking animation. The attack cool down is removed and this is all done through plugins. Essentially the 1.9 player is playing 1.8 without the animations.
 

Ferrcho

Well-Known Member
Jun 24, 2019
946
849
149
18
Spain
Just remembered this thread, going to respond to a few messages, I don’t

This is not how it is done. The shield acts as blocking and it works the same as blocking, just without the blocking animation. The attack cool down is removed and this is all done through plugins. Essentially the 1.9 player is playing 1.8 without the animations.

But everything you just told me, that is not done with a snap of the fingers, but that costs a lot even if it is said very easily.
 
Members Online

Team online

Latest profile posts

Mr Jii Gamer wrote on r1ftz9462's profile.
Happy birthday
GiGaGekkies wrote on r1ftz9462's profile.
Happy Birthday
blazingwind47 wrote on JokeKaedee's profile.
u seem like a cool person
Top Bottom