All Networks Apelación a este reporte por hacer equipo con un hacker - Appeal to this report for teaming up with a hacker

[SrMuerto7w7]

Hola comunidad, ¿cómo están? quería pedirles su opinión sobre este reporte, dos jugadores hacen team en skywars (modalidad donde en solitario aparece una advertencia antes de iniciar la partida dice: hacer team es baneable) en minecraft bedrock, uno es reportado de hacker y el otro, aunque es bueno jugando el reporte es denegado porque según el moderador/ra y cito: "Lo sentimos. Su informe ha sido rechazado porque se permite formar equipos cuando todos los jugadores restantes con vida en una partida están de acuerdo." ¿Esta realmente bien que se permita eso? ya que con el que haces equipo es un hacker y se le puede dar una ventaja injusta ante la competencia simplemente para tener más vitorias, más nivel de cubecrtaft y si quieres un aspecto competitivo subir más en el ranking de victorias.

Adjunto el reporte, la respuesta que recibo y los videos de hacker y su team.

English

Hello community, how are you? I wanted to ask your opinion on this report, two players team up in skywars (mode where a warning appears before starting the game alone that says: teaming up is bannable) in minecraft bedrock, one is reported as a hacker and the other, although he is good at playing, the report is denied because according to the moderator and I quote: "We are sorry. Your report has been rejected because it is allowed to form teams when all the remaining players alive in a game agree." Is it really okay to allow that? since the one you team up with is a hacker and you can give him an unfair advantage over the competition simply to have more victories, a higher level of cubecrtaft and if you want a competitive aspect to go higher in the victory ranking.

I attach the report, the response I receive and the videos of the hacker and his team.

Report SjxSeven6767

Report oscartqm10

A la fecha realiza una apelación y esperare una respuesta.

To date, make an appeal and I will wait for a response.

 

[GG KING 1234576]

Hola comunidad, ¿cómo están? quería pedirles su opinión sobre este reporte, dos jugadores hacen team en skywars (modalidad donde en solitario aparece una advertencia antes de iniciar la partida dice: hacer team es baneable) en minecraft bedrock, uno es reportado de hacker y el otro, aunque es bueno jugando el reporte es denegado porque según el moderador/ra y cito: "Lo sentimos. Su informe ha sido rechazado porque se permite formar equipos cuando todos los jugadores restantes con vida en una partida están de acuerdo." ¿Esta realmente bien que se permita eso? ya que con el que haces equipo es un hacker y se le puede dar una ventaja injusta ante la competencia simplemente para tener más vitorias, más nivel de cubecrtaft y si quieres un aspecto competitivo subir más en el ranking de victorias.

Adjunto el reporte, la respuesta que recibo y los videos de hacker y su team.

English

Hello community, how are you? I wanted to ask your opinion on this report, two players team up in skywars (mode where a warning appears before starting the game alone that says: teaming up is bannable) in minecraft bedrock, one is reported as a hacker and the other, although he is good at playing, the report is denied because according to the moderator and I quote: "We are sorry. Your report has been rejected because it is allowed to form teams when all the remaining players alive in a game agree." Is it really okay to allow that? since the one you team up with is a hacker and you can give him an unfair advantage over the competition simply to have more victories, a higher level of cubecrtaft and if you want a competitive aspect to go higher in the victory ranking.

I attach the report, the response I receive and the videos of the hacker and his team.

Report SjxSeven6767

Report oscartqm10

View attachment 243982

A la fecha realiza una apelación y esperare una respuesta.

To date, make an appeal and I will wait for a response.

I get your concern, and honestly this situation is a bit tricky.


The rule about “teaming being allowed when all remaining players agree” is usually meant for very specific situations at the end of a match, where it’s more like a temporary truce rather than actual unfair teaming. But in this case, the bigger issue isn’t just teaming — it’s who they’re teaming with.


If one of the players is clearly hacking, then teaming with them gives a massive unfair advantage, even if the other player isn’t cheating themselves. That kind of defeats the purpose of fair play, especially in a solo mode where everyone is supposed to compete individually.


So while the moderator’s response might technically follow that specific rule, I do think situations like this should be looked at more carefully. Teaming with a hacker shouldn’t really be treated the same as a normal end-game agreement.


At the very least, it raises questions about whether that rule should have exceptions when cheats are involved.

 

[SpringWarz 🌸]

Hello, as far as I can see the reported cheater was banned by Sentinel and by the mod who handled your report which was stated in one of your reports. However, we do not punish for users teaming with cheaters via reports and instead only if the teaming is witnessed by a moderator ingame.

 

[SrMuerto7w7]

Hello, as far as I can see the reported cheater was banned by Sentinel and by the mod who handled your report which was stated in one of your reports. However, we do not punish for users teaming with cheaters via reports and instead only if the teaming is witnessed by a moderator ingame.

Hola agradezco toda sus opiniones, les informo que el ban fue nuevamente rechazado, creo que acá solo queda aceptar que dentro de las reglas no está mal lo que hizo, como lo comento @GG KING 1234576 quizás el mayor problema es con quien lo hace en una postura competitiva claro que genera un desventaja injusta y debería ser analizada con más detalle y aclarar este tipo de conductas de una manera más específica para no señalar a un jugador de manera injusta, me disculpo con el jugador oscartqm10 si en algún momento lee esto y se siente señalado por algo que no hizo mal.

English

Hello, I appreciate all your opinions. I'm letting you know that the ban was rejected again. I think we can only accept that what he did wasn't wrong according to the rules. As @GG KING 1234576 mentioned, perhaps the biggest problem is when someone does it in a competitive setting. It clearly creates an unfair disadvantage and should be analyzed in more detail. These types of behaviors should be clarified more specifically to avoid unfairly singling out any player. I apologize to the player oscartqm10 if he ever reads this and feels singled out for something he didn't do wrong.

 

[GG KING 1234576]

Hola agradezco toda sus opiniones, les informo que el ban fue nuevamente rechazado, creo que acá solo queda aceptar que dentro de las reglas no está mal lo que hizo, como lo comento @GG KING 1234576 quizás el mayor problema es con quien lo hace en una postura competitiva claro que genera un desventaja injusta y debería ser analizada con más detalle y aclarar este tipo de conductas de una manera más específica para no señalar a un jugador de manera injusta, me disculpo con el jugador oscartqm10 si en algún momento lee esto y se siente señalado por algo que no hizo mal.

English

Hello, I appreciate all your opinions. I'm letting you know that the ban was rejected again. I think we can only accept that what he did wasn't wrong according to the rules. As @GG KING 1234576 mentioned, perhaps the biggest problem is when someone does it in a competitive setting. It clearly creates an unfair disadvantage and should be analyzed in more detail. These types of behaviors should be clarified more specifically to avoid unfairly singling out any player. I apologize to the player oscartqm10 if he ever reads this and feels singled out for something he didn't do wrong.

I really respect how you handled this situation.


Even though it’s frustrating, you accepted the decision and looked at it from both sides, which is honestly the best approach in cases like this. You’re right — according to the current rules, the player didn’t technically do anything punishable.


That said, I still agree with your point. In a competitive setting, teaming with a hacker creates a clear unfair advantage, even if it isn’t directly against the rules in this specific context. It’s one of those situations where the rules could probably be clarified or improved to avoid confusion in the future.


Also, the fact that you apologized to the player shows a lot of maturity and fairness. Not many people would do that.


Hopefully discussions like this help bring more clarity to these edge cases