For example: In the real world, you're not supposed to get a heavier vote in something just because you've spent money. I highly doubt that the fact that stone ranks have equal votes when it comes to maps, is worth your entire $300 rank.
This isn't the real world, it's Mine Craft. I've never said that their equal votes are equivalent to my voting, either.
Voting for which map you play, is nothing compared to all of the game modifiers on all minigames. Why would you get a rank just to vote for arcade maps?
Premium ranks already have a lot of perks, and seeing something that both you and stone ranks can do does not mean that should be taken away from stone ranks.
I'm mainly talking about the maps, not modifiers. I've also never suggested that their voting abilities be taken away.
Using that logic, I might as well suggest a system where only ranks can join games. Why? Because the ones who spent no money don't deserve the same abilities as me.
Okay, now you're being quite irrational. I've never suggested this at all. I'm simply asking why they have the same chances of getting that map. Ranks and stones are equal, yes, but as ranks, we should (I don't know how to word this) have a higher chance of getting our poll above stones. It's logical, as you have a rank.
Sooo what's the harm in giving a stone rank something to vote for? Ranks still have so many more features than stone ranks.
Again, I never suggested having their abilities to vote taken away. Yes, ranks have other abilities over stones. We can fly in the lobbies, vote for maps and modifiers, and have colored names and rewards. But only all of that goes a short way. I still don't think people that have spent no money at all on
ranks (Not miniature packs) should have equal voting than people who have.
Heck, equal voting for maps isn't even a gamechanging thing or anything.
Erm, it kinda' is.
Because it was the most popular choice. It makes sense to best suit the majority. That way more people are happy.
It was equal. No other map was voted for, just the two maps which both had three votes on each. The fact that the map we ranks
didn't vote for didn't win, and the one which the stones voted for did, is absurd. (My opinion)
Having stone rank does not mean that player has not spent money on the server. I have the stone rank. I spent my money on other items like Miniatures and Point Multipliers. Why is it so unfair that we are equal, in a field that didn't even exist at the time of payment by either party? Forget players like me, why is it so unfair that the majority of players (those who have the Stone rank) have the choice of map that they have everywhere else across the network?
Besides the point on miniatures, I still think players are equal. Stone ranks and ranks above are all equal. But ranks have perks, much more than the stones do. I still dislike the fact that it's equal voting. Yes, I am suggesting they still can vote. I never said take away their voting abilities all together. But I'd like there to be a higher chance for the maps to be voted on by the ranks to actually win, for obvious reasons.
I believe it's logical to stay more consistent with the rest of the network, and not introduce new policies that only subtract from the common player's abilities.
I see your point, and I respect your opinion. Players are equal, and that's all that matters. I'm going to still stick with my opinion, though. Ranks have their perks over the common players, and voting is a perk that comes with the ranks. If people have the same chance of their map actually winning that are common players, then I see it as no point to get a rank at all. That means it's a loss of money for the server, which causes trouble. Yes, the common players can vote on very few games, but I still thinks people who have ranks should have at least a 30% chance higher of their maps actually being chosen for game play.
