Bans by mods incur a 30 day ban while bans by the anti cheat incur a 7 day ban, depending on what it was. Why the difference? Why is potential human error harsher than the bot?
And with appeals seeming to get denied without explanation, it would seem to be fairer if the bans from a mod were lesser or the bans the same. Say a 14 day ban for both or 14 for just a mod. Since 7 day bans from a bot designed to tackle hackers and people using those types of mods seems quite small in reference to a mod ban. 30 days, over 4 times longer than a bot ban. Wouldn’t it seem fair to punish cheaters the same, no matter who they were caught by?
So I propose we change the bans to be the same or meet in the middle. 14 days for both. Reducing the time for possible minor cheating when caught by a mod but also increasing the time when caught by a bot, both of which are most likely more severe cheaters.
And with appeals seeming to get denied without explanation, it would seem to be fairer if the bans from a mod were lesser or the bans the same. Say a 14 day ban for both or 14 for just a mod. Since 7 day bans from a bot designed to tackle hackers and people using those types of mods seems quite small in reference to a mod ban. 30 days, over 4 times longer than a bot ban. Wouldn’t it seem fair to punish cheaters the same, no matter who they were caught by?
So I propose we change the bans to be the same or meet in the middle. 14 days for both. Reducing the time for possible minor cheating when caught by a mod but also increasing the time when caught by a bot, both of which are most likely more severe cheaters.