Only the best players at the top!

[iWillGetYou]

Hi, I have a suggestion for more fair statistics. Now often people who have played extreme many games are on the top, while they’re not per definition the ones whom win/lose ratio in the past month was the highest. Of course there should be a minimum of how much games you must have played before your lose/win ratio is in charge for the podium. Wouldn’t it be more fair to show the best on top?

 

[telegamer]

No that wouldn't be more fair, why? Well when you just started playing Minecraft/Cubecraft you might not have been that good so you lost a lot of games and therefore have a bad win/lose ratio.

 

[iWillGetYou]

No that wouldn't be more fair, why? Well when you just started playing Minecraft/Cubecraft you might not have been that good so you lost a lot of games and therefore have a bad win/lose ratio.

That's why I suggest to count only the wins and loses of the past month. ;)

 

[Deleted member 204478]

Same as what tele said, people who have just started playing on Cubecraft have the unfair advantage of being at the top.
While some other people are playing Cubecraft every day on the same game, E.G. 2000 wins but 1000 losses (2:1), and the ones who just began to play on the server could have a win/loss ratio of 4:1 just from 5 games.

 

[Thaus]

I'd rather have the monthly wins being shown. Basically what would show up would be the wins you got for that month so that everyone would have a chance.

 

[Milkyy]

I don't believe so, if you want to be on the podium, then start playing that specific game often. I have been watching the eggwars leader board everytime I go into the lobby. If you looked closely, a player named Shadoshi has made his way up to the leader board. It's not an easy task, but is fair. -1 from me

 

[iWillGetYou]

While some other people are playing Cubecraft every day on the same game, E.G. 2000 wins but 1000 losses (2:1), and the ones who just began to play on the server could have a win/loss ratio of 4:1 just from 5 games.

That's why I wrote: "Of course there should be a minimum of how much games you must have played before your lose/win ratio is in charge for the podium"
So, you have to play a minimum number of games (again only looking to the past month) to count for the podium. Let say, at least 50 games. Then a ratio score is fair. And yes, new players can reach more fast the top if they have a good win/lose ratio.

 

[iWillGetYou]

If you looked closely, a player named Shadoshi has made his way up to the leader board. It's not an easy task, but is fair.

That could be, but only counting the wins is not resulting in knowing who's the best. I know about players who played also at night to reach the top, while beside winning also losing a lot of games. So, that's unfair

 

[Milkyy]

That could be, but only counting the wins is not resulting in knowing who's the best. I know about players who played also at night to reach the top, while beside winning also losing a lot of games. So, that's unfair

That may be so, but if your on the leader board, chances are that they have really good win/lose ratio. Doubt anyone would spend hours on a game they can't win easily in.

 

[ElPtricko]

I do think that the leaderboard should be reset every month so then everyone gets a chance to get on it. But most people didn't seem to like the idea.
In my opinion there should be a seperate leaderboard that shows the months top winners.

 

[matcha]

A lot of people assume the people on the leaderboard are the best players. They may be pretty good at it, but that doesn't mean there aren't others who are better. Yet I hardly want the current leaderboard removed because those players aren't the best.

I do think that the leaderboard should be reset every month so then everyone gets a chance to get on it. But most people didn't seem to like the idea.
In my opinion there should be a seperate leaderboard that shows the months top winners.

This would be much better.

 

[Qin Shihuangdi]

So basically all the people who just get stacked...

 

[Injunction]

Hi, I have a suggestion for more fair statistics. Now often people who have played extreme many games are on the top, while they’re not per definition the ones whom win/lose ratio in the past month was the highest. Of course there should be a minimum of how much games you must have played before your lose/win ratio is in charge for the podium. Wouldn’t it be more fair to show the best on top?

This is very unfair to everyone
Even the people who are on the leaderboard

 

[Deeds]

I perfer to leave it as is.
Reason- What tele said :P

 

[Jqrz]

Hm... Not really!
I think the players who have the most wins, should be on top.
They really try to get into the leaderboards, so why should we crush their dreams?

My channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/jazzplaysminecraft

 

[ElPtricko]

@Jqrz @Deeds_GG @jollow250 Try reading my post/comment, you might like that more.

 

[Injunction]

@Jqrz @Deeds_GG @jollow250 Try reading my post/comment, you might like that more.

Try not the same thing

 

[ElPtricko]

Try not the same thing

What i said is not the same. He said to replace the current leaderboards with a monthly one, but i said that there should be a seperate leaderboard for that.

 

[iWillGetYou]

What i said is not the same. He said to replace the current leaderboards with a monthly one, but i said that there should be a seperate leaderboard for that.

That is a good idea.

 

[Troublesomee]

I think the leaderboard is good as it is now, the players who are in the leaderboards now, just deserve it, they worked hard to get there, also, you can just get in ANY leaderboard you want, you just have to work hard.
-1. :)