New Rank

[Pitufo01]

I think there was a new rank, between diamond and emerald, or a rank best than obsidian. I tjink that name rank can be BedRock, and a rank between diamond and emerald can be called quartz, an a coal rank.
I thonk it was a nice idea, like to rubikcubeman check this

 

[Qin Shihuangdi]

I think there was a new rank, between diamond and emerald, or a rank best than obsidian. I tjink that name rank can be BedRock, and a rank between diamond and emerald can be called quartz, an a coal rank.
I thonk it was a nice idea, like to rubikcubeman check this

How about we actually give stuff to obsidian

 

[Krealίxx]

I think there was a new rank, between diamond and emerald, or a rank best than obsidian. I tjink that name rank can be BedRock, and a rank between diamond and emerald can be called quartz, an a coal rank.
I thonk it was a nice idea, like to rubikcubeman check this

Too many ranks = Less features for each rank
Less features for each rank = Less uses to buy a rank
Less uses to buy a rank = Too expensive ranks
Too expensive ranks = No $$$

 

[GeldHaftige]

I think there was a new rank, between diamond and emerald, or a rank best than obsidian. I tjink that name rank can be BedRock, and a rank between diamond and emerald can be called quartz, an a coal rank.
I thonk it was a nice idea, like to rubikcubeman check this

Quartz higher than diamond?? I think that diamond rarer is than quartz. I don't think that There must to be a rank that higher is than obsidian, because much people are nagging that you can't anything extra with obsidian than emerald. I like the coal rank :P

 

[CubeTale]

The difference between diamond and emerald - emerald and obsidian is pretty small. The difference between the new ranks would be waaayyy to small and it would never be worth the difference in money, so it would be pretty pointless. Maybe we can try to make the difference between the ranks bigger instead:).

 

[Wintrie]

I think we dont really need a new rank until cubecraft adds more features that would be worth buying

 

[MimicPanda]

I do not see a purpose to adding new ranks,a rank between diamond and emerald is not really necessary.If a new rank does get added (highly unlikely) the staff will have to give it perks that stand out.Instead of adding new ranks we should add more features to ranks we already have,as you may know obsidian is lacking a lot of content so adding new ranks will just make things more complicated.So I have to disagree with this idea.

 

[Spleefy]

I agree with many of the comments in that there is only a small difference in perks between the ranks, especially em and obi. Being an obi, I am not impressed with the perks and features in relation to the cost of the rank. IMO, adding more ranks would be useless. I feel it would be better to first increase the features/perks of the current ranks (esp., the higher ranks) rather than merely diluting what we already have by adding more ranks to the mix. And this is even more of an issue now that the win effects functionality is broken in the new arcade.

 

[ChasingRainbows]

There should be an "unobtanium" rank for a ludicrous amount of money.

 

[A pigeon]

Redstone rank and make it free . More benefits than obsidian

 

[Smanbg]

I think we dont really need a new rank until cubecraft adds more features that would be worth buying

I agree ! We don't need more ranks ...
But @Fool has a good idea - redstone rank, which could be free.

 

[BlueQuakeAdmin_]

As Donald J. Trump said, CC should actually give more perks to Obsidian rank than add more ranks.

Also, what BETTER PERKS WOULD BEDROCK RANK GIVE?

Also stated a few times from above, CC has enough ranks now. The 1 thing that should actually be improved on is giving more perks to Obsidian.

 

[Flaxic]

I don't think we need more ranks, I just think that we need to get more perks with the ranks.

 

[ItzCamJam]

Nah we got enough ranks. I said the same thing and people spammed me with no's

 

[Tom25W]

I think we dont really need a new rank until cubecraft adds more features that would be worth buying

Maybe you forgot what Ranks are. They should be seen as a donation and not as purchase to ensure your profit/benefits

 

[SrKlompenstein]

How about we actually give stuff to obsidian

Exactly, as you said, the other ranks need more. Especially obsidian because emerald and obsidian are way to similar. Then why don't we give more features to the current ranks instead of adding some new ranks, which will be more expensive?

Also, have you thought about the prefix color? Because 'coal' and 'bedrock' have the same color, black. In my opinion, this'll not match in the tablist. :)

 

[CyberAutumn]

I think we don't need any ranks. The difference between Emerald and Obsidian is kind of the same, but also different. For instance, Obsidian have awards on a certain amount of time, I think it is every five - seven days. You earn more points that way. If there would be a Bedrock rank, what would it do? What perks would it have? I am pretty sure it'll just be the same as Obsidian. -1 from me, sorry. :(

 

[Snodia]

Maybe you forgot what Ranks are. They should be seen as a donation and not as purchase to ensure your profit/benefits

But obtaining a rank via a purchase is not a donation. A donation is giving money for nothing in return.

Anyways, I don't think we need more ranks to clutter up the store. I think that they should just improve on the current ranks that are available.

 

[Maaarijn]

And Bedrock will be 500$ whitout any extra's

 

[LilNugget]

Personally I believe the ranks now are just fine, and would rather see them boosted than new ranks added.