I love all the organics and stuff! It's very detailed and cool. The only thing you should do is to mix around a bit with the floor. Try some different patterns and block palettes. You definitely got my vote :)
Minecraft PC IP: play.cubecraft.net
Not trying to be rude or anything but that implies you have disliked almost every map submitted, minus your own and a few random ones. Seems. Odd. Also maybe you could give some feedback to make it more to your liking? It's more helpful then voting no sand saying: "I just simply don't like it."
Well considering everyone else likes it and your the only one who dislikes it, I would feel like giving criticism would help improve the map creator's work AND give reasoning. Especially considering you vote no quite often AND you were a designer. Also, I do know because I can look at most of the thread poll results that are not locked and when I see the NO's almost every time your name pops up. Let alone the fact I and Nutuu are not the first people to ask you this question. Is it so hard to give some feedback? It can be really frustrating when someone just says no and gives no explanation or feedback what so ever.
Also: magma is used to mark the checkpoints visibly, so it would be taken off anyway!
Builds [FFA] - Undersea (EDITED)
- Thread starter Nutuu
- Start date
-
- Tags
- ffa underwater
- Status
Thanks! It's sandstone and sand, you just can't notice the sandstone until you get to run on the ground. But I think I will change the sand to birch wood :D
_The13thDoctor_
Forum Professional
Not trying to be rude or anything but that implies you have disliked almost every map submitted, minus your own and a few random ones. Seems. Odd. Also maybe you could give some feedback to make it more to your liking? It's more helpful then voting no sand saying: "I just simply don't like it."
Yeah, a problem. You could tell me what could I make better, what don't you like it etc.
Again. Why do I must give feedback?? You do not know how many maps I voted for no unless you have a prove of it.
_The13thDoctor_
Forum Professional
Well considering everyone else likes it and your the only one who dislikes it, I would feel like giving criticism would help improve the map creator's work AND give reasoning. Especially considering you vote no quite often AND you were a designer. Also, I do know because I can look at most of the thread poll results that are not locked and when I see the NO's almost every time your name pops up. Let alone the fact I and Nutuu are not the first people to ask you this question. Is it so hard to give some feedback? It can be really frustrating when someone just says no and gives no explanation or feedback what so ever.
it looks good but it needs waaaay more detail imo. you have small detailed areas spotted around but the rest of the map is just empty. you made the sky detailed with fish and stuff but left the ground sorely lacking. I also don't like the terrain because it's too smooth and blobby
what you have is good so far, it just needs more work
what you have is good so far, it just needs more work
yeah, thanks. I'll add something on the rest of the terrain too, and fix some coloring on the terrain which looks messy.
Now that I googled what it actually is, I definitely agree it has the same elements as that map does. Thanks!
I’m gonna have to agree with @FireExcalibur10 on one thing. No one is forced to give a justification behind their voting decisions. If they don’t like it, it can stay as a personal thing and does not have to be shared with. Everyone who makes a Map Submission or just Suggestions in general should be willing to have people who vote against without giving a reason behind it. And that is completely fair, there’s a reason why people are allowed to vote without having to comment on the thread. Not everyone has the time/energy/motivation to write an explanation as to why they voted for a certain option, and that’s completely fair. The way I see it, it’s really a bad and somewhat annoying tendency to ask people to give a reason behind their votes.
Now about the map itself, I like it a lot which is why I voted yes. Little detail though, Magma isn’t a 1.8 block so that has to be changed. The mermaid looks a bit odd to me, but I’m nowhere near a good organics builder so I can’t really tell what’s off about it. But it doesn’t look completely natural, as it could. The map seems way too large but I’m unsure of the common dimensions of a FFA map so I wouldn’t really be able to give a good statement about that. Some spaces look way too plain, and perhaps they could use some obstacles, of course open spaces are important AND necessary but they could be a tad smaller. Perhaps I’d suggest to make the map a bit smaller and bring everything closer together, that’s just a personal preference though. And regardless of the things I’ve commented on, I’d be thrilled to see this map added to the server. Really neat job.
Now about the map itself, I like it a lot which is why I voted yes. Little detail though, Magma isn’t a 1.8 block so that has to be changed. The mermaid looks a bit odd to me, but I’m nowhere near a good organics builder so I can’t really tell what’s off about it. But it doesn’t look completely natural, as it could. The map seems way too large but I’m unsure of the common dimensions of a FFA map so I wouldn’t really be able to give a good statement about that. Some spaces look way too plain, and perhaps they could use some obstacles, of course open spaces are important AND necessary but they could be a tad smaller. Perhaps I’d suggest to make the map a bit smaller and bring everything closer together, that’s just a personal preference though. And regardless of the things I’ve commented on, I’d be thrilled to see this map added to the server. Really neat job.
Thanks for the feedback! I really appreciate how you take your time to answer such a long text.
Also: magma is used to mark the checkpoints visibly, so it would be taken off anyway!
Last edited:
_The13thDoctor_
Forum Professional
Probably yeah. I'm going to add more stuff on the rest of the terrain later on today.
- Status
