Minecraft PC IP: play.cubecraft.net
Yeah, I feel this seems interesting. Maybe they get:
2 points for iron donator
3 points for lapis
4 points gold
5 for diamond
6 for emerald
I donated to this server so it does not go under like the last server I played on. The cool perks were just things that I would enjoy so to speak. Although, I do not want them to be diminished because a few stones find it harder to fight me. Although, if they do kill me or another donator they could get rewarded with a larger point number.
Kkbubble aren't you gold? It is surprising to see someone like your self make a post like this.
If you really do want to see this idea on the server try posting something in suggestions. That way more people will see it and more staff will become interested .
Your suggestion would open for a lot of people just killing their donator friends to get a lot of points. It wouldn't be such a good idea. Instead we should have it so that donators doesn't get points from killing stones.
Look, it was just a suggestion. Look, you guys realize you did not want stones getting OP gear. "I agree with" because people would attack them. This you do not like because more people could attack donators. No matter what donators would be attacked. And you guys do not like teams in pvp anyways. As you said it could break the teams up.
There is no perfect consistency between donators and stones. One majority will be on top for a few days and that could change later. This idea only gives a few more points to a stone who can kill a donator. It is not like we are deciding something very serious and important.
And I really do not like that idea that only gives points to donators who kill donators and no points for stone kills. Honestly, I recommend just keeping it as it is. As talonial said.
Adv.1.grammatically - in a grammatical manner; "this child already speaks grammatically"
ungrammatically - in an ungrammatical manner; "this child speaks ungrammatically"
Anyway this doesn't matter at all, we should get more on topic, such as going back to discussing wether or not we believe donators should be worth more points when you kill them.
donors need to be balanced in kit PVP
- Thread starter kkbubble
- Start date
Yeah, I feel this seems interesting. Maybe they get:
2 points for iron donator
3 points for lapis
4 points gold
5 for diamond
6 for emerald
I donated to this server so it does not go under like the last server I played on. The cool perks were just things that I would enjoy so to speak. Although, I do not want them to be diminished because a few stones find it harder to fight me. Although, if they do kill me or another donator they could get rewarded with a larger point number.
Kkbubble aren't you gold? It is surprising to see someone like your self make a post like this.
If you really do want to see this idea on the server try posting something in suggestions. That way more people will see it and more staff will become interested .
Your suggestion would open for a lot of people just killing their donator friends to get a lot of points. It wouldn't be such a good idea. Instead we should have it so that donators doesn't get points from killing stones.
Look, it was just a suggestion. Look, you guys realize you did not want stones getting OP gear. "I agree with" because people would attack them. This you do not like because more people could attack donators. No matter what donators would be attacked. And you guys do not like teams in pvp anyways. As you said it could break the teams up.
There is no perfect consistency between donators and stones. One majority will be on top for a few days and that could change later. This idea only gives a few more points to a stone who can kill a donator. It is not like we are deciding something very serious and important.
And I really do not like that idea that only gives points to donators who kill donators and no points for stone kills. Honestly, I recommend just keeping it as it is. As talonial said.
awesomepingu2005
Well-Known Member
awesomepingu2005
Well-Known Member
Actually, that correction was incorrect, you see, John said :
Asking, what is he correcting to their? When you look at it like that my dear friend, it is perfectly and gramatically correct. I think.
Adv.1.grammatically - in a grammatical manner; "this child already speaks grammatically"
ungrammatically - in an ungrammatical manner; "this child speaks ungrammatically"
Anyway this doesn't matter at all, we should get more on topic, such as going back to discussing wether or not we believe donators should be worth more points when you kill them.
