I've had it to, But I tell the hole story in my appeal and I got a unban they react in like 2 days.
Minecraft PC IP: play.cubecraft.net
a staff member is a human, his/her efficiency cant be calculated.
When a player(not hacker) is banned for more than 7 days, he will be very angry(it shouldnt-> he deserves it), but this happens.
And this Angry-Player would search on Google how to create fake accounts, once he learns how to do it,
Guess What??!!!
A new Hacker has born
2. How would shorter bans increase the amount of appeals
3. People dont get banned more often, they get banned for a lesser amount of time
All Networks Bring back 7-days sentinel bans
- Thread starter quartz 🌈
- Start date
- Status
Sometimes you get denied becauso of an error, that happen ed to me, I got to talk to a dev because I got dennied my appeal
Because hackers can say I am banned for nothing I was building and I got banned. if everbody gets a free unban with that the staff dont know whats real and what is unreal you understand?
98% was for Anti-Cheat.
a staff member is a human, his/her efficiency cant be calculated.
I'm all for change in the right direction and things like this being brought up is great, but I would like to clarify as I feel that this is a bit misleading. Out of the 8 screenshots there, 5 of them were not in fact banned in the same day, and 2 of them were undone very quickly. Having any false bans is always of course an issue, however in a single day that is one person who would've been potentially affected by this suggestion, not eight people.
yeah i said it wrong, its supposed to be "messages about false bans in a single day", mb
I totally agree with your suggestion I also saw a few players being false banned in many SkyWars or Eggwars games and after this complaining about it in staffhelp, but I also have saw many players who complain about it in staffhelp but wasn't falsly banned, most of them probably were hacking.
Anyways yes, there's also many many players that were punished inccorectly by sentinel.
But in my eyes the staffteam has to look strict in the appeal, after the player was banned for cheating-detection two times, after the second 7 days ban (if the first got accepted.)
As I said I
Anyways yes, there's also many many players that were punished inccorectly by sentinel.
But in my eyes the staffteam has to look strict in the appeal, after the player was banned for cheating-detection two times, after the second 7 days ban (if the first got accepted.)
As I said I
Hackers create temporary accounts, after 2-3 days, the account would be locked and can be unlocked by adding a phone number, at this point any ban is pointless.
When a player(not hacker) is banned for more than 7 days, he will be very angry(it shouldnt-> he deserves it), but this happens.
And this Angry-Player would search on Google how to create fake accounts, once he learns how to do it,
Guess What??!!!
A new Hacker has born
Last edited:
Hackers create temporary accounts, after 2-3 days, the account would be locked and can be unlocked by adding a phone number, at this point any ban is pointless.
When a player(not hacker) is banned for more than 7 days, he will be very angry(it shouldnt-> he deserves it), but this happens.
And this Angry-Player would search on Google how to create fake accounts, once he learns how to do it,
Guess What??!!!
A new Hac
If you get banned by sentinel you get some blocked IP by sentinel. So hackers cant join new accounts and play on it or the use a vpn.Hackers create temporary accounts, after 2-3 days, the account would be locked and can be unlocked by adding a phone number, at this point any ban is pointless.
When a player(not hacker) is banned for more than 7 days, he will be very angry(it shouldnt-> he deserves it), but this happens.
And this Angry-Player would search on Google how to create fake accounts, once he learns how to do it,
Guess What??!!!
A new Hacker has born
Sorry but this doesn't seem really accurate, however, if it was then Sentinel would be doing pretty good. This would mean that only 0.005% of Sentinel bans today (I used the numbers of today) would be false. I think the issue with shorter bans is that there will be more appeals for us to handle if people have to be banned more often. It's a no from me, sorry I don't think this will benefit anyone.
1. If sentinel was actually good, there shouldnt be like 2-5 false bans a day
2. How would shorter bans increase the amount of appeals
3. People dont get banned more often, they get banned for a lesser amount of time
- Status
Similar threads
Team online
-
SpringWarzSenior Moderator -
ThjisMood -
Frontlanethe person below me is cute -
ToonBerModerator 🍰 -
dvodanySpytastic
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
All Networks CubeCraft’s Progression System Needs an Overhaul- Latest: 99th_DutchNubnub
