Bedrock 15 cps?

[M8KI05]

My latest reports in recent months have shown that over 98% of clicks were due to autoclick, double click, or drag.

Achieving more than 15 CPS is humanly possible, but maintaining it for more than 10-15 seconds is not. Most people use mouse manipulation, macros, or dragging; I'm sure it's currently being reported por cps que por hacks, It's rare to play and not find someone abusing the rules in the sense of the cps. Sentinel should kick out players who exceed 15 cps and then ban them after repeated offenses. 5 days, 10 days, 15 days, 1 month.

Many reports have been denied due to lack of evidence or "benefit of the doubt," even when it's clear the user is abusing the rules. These reports should be reviewed by several mods. The easiest way is to implement it with Sentinel, making sure it's functional, with no alerts, just direct expulsion, and we'll see how reports on this issue decrease drastically.

 

[Critly]

I'm pretty sure Sentinel already does this. If you look at the CubeCraft Rules under the category “Third-party Client Modifications or Addons”, it already states that CubeCraft recommends staying below 15 CPS and that Sentinel may kick you if you exceed it.

With the wording 'may', I assume the anticheat isn't simply checking whether someone briefly reaches 16 CPS, but is instead taking other factors into account before deciding whether to kick someone. There are probably different checks involved to prevent legitimate players from being falsely kicked.

So while I understand the suggestion of making Sentinel automatically kick players exceeding 15 CPS, I believe this functionality may already exist. The bigger question might instead be how consistently these detections are triggered and how reports are handled when Sentinel doesn't detect the behavior.

 

[M8KI05]

Estoy bastante seguro de que Sentinel ya hace esto. Si revisas las reglas de CubeCraft en la categoría " Modificaciones o complementos de clientes de terceros " , ya indica que CubeCraft recomienda mantenerse por debajo de 15 CPS y que Sentinel puede expulsarte si lo superas.

Con la palabra " puede" , supongo que el sistema antitrampas no se limita a comprobar si alguien alcanza brevemente los 16 clics por segundo, sino que toma en cuenta otros factores antes de decidir si expulsar a alguien. Probablemente se implementen diferentes comprobaciones para evitar que jugadores legítimos sean expulsados injustamente.

Si bien entiendo la sugerencia de que Sentinel expulse automáticamente a los jugadores que superen los 15 clics por segundo, creo que esta funcionalidad ya existe. La cuestión más importante quizás sea con qué frecuencia se activan estas detecciones y cómo se gestionan los informes cuando Sentinel no detecta el comportamiento.

It works, but it's not efficient. In 6 out of 10 games, I encounter someone using macros/auto/drag/double-click.

 

[Critly]

It works, but it's not efficient. In 6 out of 10 games, I encounter someone using macros/auto/drag/double-click.

That's exactly what I mean. Sentinel is probably checking different kind of factors when someone reaches or exceeds 15 CPS, rather than simply kicking anyone who briefly hits that number, regardless of whether it's legitimate or not. The question unfortunately, is which factors are being checked, and I definitely agree that this is something that should be looked into further and possibly improved further on.

As for the frustration you're experiencing when reporting players for CPS related offences, and them getting the 'benefit of the doubt', I usually record a clip of around 15 seconds and upload it. I then slow the video down to 0.5x speed and look closely at their clicking. If I see someone placing more than two to three blocks within that interval, I usually report them. Honestly, I haven't had a single report denied when using this strategy.

 

[Rabidsyllab]

I recently reported a player for thinking he was drag clicking. Whilst I understand there isn't much evidence for my case and fully respect and understand the decision made, was curious what the community thought about it