A
A pigeon
Guest
I hope this never gets added in . No matter how little people donate , all their votes should be the same . Either be able to vote equally or dont . Obsidians should not be more important than anyone else
Minecraft PC IP: play.cubecraft.net
You are essentially giving people who paid a bit of money EXTRA STUFF in game. That is literally the definition of the commercial EULA lmao.
They used to do this.
Then they removed it "due to the EULA".
Chances are they are not going to add it again.
And it's 100% against the EULA either way. Deal with it ;)
Voting Rank Powers [Eggwars]
- Thread starter BlueQuakeAdmin_
- Start date
People are gonna wast al their monney on a rank. And more people are getting an obsidian rank, so in every game with an obsidian ranker, the lower ranks would have no change to vote. And not everyone can afford such a high price for a rank. It would be kinda annoying for those lower ranks. No, sorry. -1
CubeTale
Well-Known Member
I'm really not sure why everyone is opposing this. The best increase that an obsidian rank would get is 17%. Eggwars voting should really be changed to random.
Okay so how it currently works is like this
Player A votes for overpowered
overpowered has a 100% chance of winning
now Player B votes for normal
overpowered has a 50% chance of winning and normal has a 50% chance of winning
now Player C votes for overpowered
overpowered has a 66.6 (bar notation) % chance of winning and normal has a 33.3 (bar notation) % chance of winning
now Player D votes for overpowered
overpowered has a 75% chance of winning and normal has a 25% chance of winning
but if Player B had an Obsidian rank and A, C, & D, all had gold than the odds of it being normal would be swayed to 50% instead of what it would currently be at without this for 25%
I feel like this would be very unfair think about it right now in this scenario player B can still win without this being added but it is just a less likely chance than if it were added they would only have a 25% chance but it would still be possible
I personally think this isn't really fair to people who bought ranks just to vote if their votes will start to become useless in comparison to higher ranks
Player A votes for overpowered
overpowered has a 100% chance of winning
now Player B votes for normal
overpowered has a 50% chance of winning and normal has a 50% chance of winning
now Player C votes for overpowered
overpowered has a 66.6 (bar notation) % chance of winning and normal has a 33.3 (bar notation) % chance of winning
now Player D votes for overpowered
overpowered has a 75% chance of winning and normal has a 25% chance of winning
but if Player B had an Obsidian rank and A, C, & D, all had gold than the odds of it being normal would be swayed to 50% instead of what it would currently be at without this for 25%
I feel like this would be very unfair think about it right now in this scenario player B can still win without this being added but it is just a less likely chance than if it were added they would only have a 25% chance but it would still be possible
I personally think this isn't really fair to people who bought ranks just to vote if their votes will start to become useless in comparison to higher ranks
I'm against this idea. It would be unfair for people that just can't afford a more expensive rank because of multiple reasons + people that already have ranks would feel scammed. The voting system is completely random and it has to stay that way, even though I don't like Overpowered games.
I see where you are coming from, but I think that voting on Eggwars is already good as it is. Obsidian already w
has more power while voting and in lobbies, I do not think that rank should increase power by that much.
has more power while voting and in lobbies, I do not think that rank should increase power by that much.
Ummm...
You are essentially giving people who paid a bit of money EXTRA STUFF in game. That is literally the definition of the commercial EULA lmao.
A
A pigeon
Guest
No its not , you should go read the eula . Things like this are allowed by eula
Ehh no.
They used to do this.
Then they removed it "due to the EULA".
Chances are they are not going to add it again.
And it's 100% against the EULA either way. Deal with it ;)
A
A pigeon
Guest
Im against this suggestion 100% since im a stone rank . But its NOT against the EULA .
Fine then. Want me to email Mojang and ask if you're so sure?
This doesn't make any sense. Stone get 0 votes, Gold gets 1, obsidian can't get 2??????
Similar threads
- Poll
