Bedrock The Downside of the new 'CPS limit' in cubecraft.

[cyberknife]

Hey there, fellow members of the forums!!
Today, I want to discuss one of the most important topic which is causing problems among the playerbase.
The recent PvP changes, including the ban of drag and double click were already making the community mad, now the CPS limit cap is causing even more troubles.
Legit players who use legal clicking methods like butterfly and jitter, get banned by the sentinel for getting over 15 cps.
However auto-clickers are still roaming freely, without any fear of punishments. I have seen several people drag click below the CPS limit and getting away with it.
This makes the game unfair and less enjoyable.
What should be the rightful solution for this?

 

[Red Crits]

Hello. A possible solution for this is to record and report players who you think are breaking rules and getting away with it here in player report forums. Thanks

 

[cyberknife]

Hello. A possible solution for this is to record and report players who you think are breaking rules and getting away with it here in player report forums. Thanks

Thank you so much for replying to this post. This shows that the staff does actually care about the playerbase.
It means a lot ^^

Have a good day <3

 

[BestOfJam77]

I also see this issue a lot and would agree if it could be changed to a higher number of CPS.

 

[GG KING 1234576]

Hey there, fellow members of the forums!!
Today, I want to discuss one of the most important topic which is causing problems among the playerbase.
The recent PvP changes, including the ban of drag and double click were already making the community mad, now the CPS limit cap is causing even more troubles.
Legit players who use legal clicking methods like butterfly and jitter, get banned by the sentinel for getting over 15 cps.
However auto-clickers are still roaming freely, without any fear of punishments. I have seen several people drag click below the CPS limit and getting away with it.
This makes the game unfair and less enjoyable.
What should be the rightful solution for this?

Thanks for bringing this up — it’s definitely an important topic, and a lot of players have been feeling the impact of the recent PvP changes.


I agree that there are some inconsistencies right now:

• Legit butterfly/jitter players occasionally get flagged for going slightly over the CPS limit, even when they’re not using any banned methods.
• Meanwhile, some auto-clickers or low-CPS drag clickers seem to slip through without getting punished.

This creates a situation where the rules are clear, but the enforcement doesn’t always match what players experience in-game.


A possible solution could be improving Sentinel’s detection so it focuses more on patterns instead of just raw CPS numbers. Legit clicking has natural variation, while cheating patterns tend to be more uniform. Adding better behavior-based detection could help punish the right people while protecting innocent players.


Another idea could be to slightly adjust the CPS limit or give the system a small buffer for legit players who naturally peak higher for a short moment.


Overall, the goal should be to punish actual cheaters while keeping the game enjoyable for players who follow the rules — and with some refinements, I think it’s definitely possible.

 

[cyberknife]

Thanks for bringing this up — it’s definitely an important topic, and a lot of players have been feeling the impact of the recent PvP changes.


I agree that there are some inconsistencies right now:

• Legit butterfly/jitter players occasionally get flagged for going slightly over the CPS limit, even when they’re not using any banned methods.
• Meanwhile, some auto-clickers or low-CPS drag clickers seem to slip through without getting punished.

This creates a situation where the rules are clear, but the enforcement doesn’t always match what players experience in-game.


A possible solution could be improving Sentinel’s detection so it focuses more on patterns instead of just raw CPS numbers. Legit clicking has natural variation, while cheating patterns tend to be more uniform. Adding better behavior-based detection could help punish the right people while protecting innocent players.


Another idea could be to slightly adjust the CPS limit or give the system a small buffer for legit players who naturally peak higher for a short moment.


Overall, the goal should be to punish actual cheaters while keeping the game enjoyable for players who follow the rules — and with some refinements, I think it’s definitely possible.

You are right!
Improving the sentinel is basically a solution to 50 percent of ongoing conflicts between the playerbase and the cc team.

 

[cyberknife]

I also see this issue a lot and would agree if it could be changed to a higher number of CPS.

Or perhaps a big upgrade to the sentinel itself?

 

[Siza]

To my knowledge you can click as fast as you want if you're using a legal method, it's just recommended to not click above 15 cps. And if you ask me, you can't click that fast using any of the allowed methods. Besides, who needs more than that anyway?

 

[cyberknife]

To my knowledge you can click as fast as you want if you're using a legal method, it's just recommended to not click above 15 cps. And if you ask me, you can't click that fast using any of the allowed methods. Besides, who needs more than that anyway?

It is just a perspective of what community is saying:)
I haven't included my personal opinions on this, it is what the playerbase wants.
Thank you so much for your perspective tho, I completely respect it, and agree with your point that we don't need anything above 15.
But the point is not the CPS limit, but the harm is it causing.... You can ask random players about this, I can already tell you that every 2nd player you will find do not agree with this change.