Java Spectator mode

[Matriox]

Then the only way to handle rule breakers is to inprove sentinel. I don’t understand why you feel responsible.

Ofc we are responsible as an ex staff member I wouldn't expect u to say this. We are the ppl who play the games every day it is fully our responsibility to report rule breakers and then for staff to punish them

And if its easier and more efficient to add a spectator mode it should be added

To clean up games of hackers such as assassinations

 

[Quis]

Ofc we are responsible as an ex staff member I wouldn't expect u to say this. We are the ppl who play the games every day it is fully our responsibility to report rule breakers and then for staff to punish them

This doesn’t make sense. Reporting someone is a choice, not your duty as a player.

Also, think about what will happen if it’s gets added. What if everyone is gonna use it at the same time. It’s not logical.

 

[Matriox]

This doesn’t make sense. Reporting someone is a choice, not your duty as a player.

Also, think about what will happen if it’s gets added. What if everyone is gonna use it at the same time. It’s not logical.

It is logical tbh I don't see ur points in this thread as helpful

 

[Quis]

Okay. So let’s say it gets implemented. What happens when you get out of spectator mode?

 

[Matriox]

I don't understand, my suggestion is that there is an npc just like the shop that puts u into spectator mode, there will then be a barrier block in ur inventory wich puts u back to the shop area to get into the game again

 

[Quis]

I don't understand, my suggestion is that there is an npc just like the shop that puts u into spectator mode, there will then be a barrier block in ur inventory wich puts u back to the shop area to get into the game again

This makes much more sense. Why did you not mention that in your suggestion?

 

[Matriox]

This makes much more sense. Why did you not mention that in your suggestion?

That's true, sorry. This was a rushed suggestion with not a lot of details

 

[Quis]

That's true, sorry. This was a rushed suggestion with not a lot of details

Details are the most important things. I recommend editing your suggestion.