Web Reports v2.0

[_The13thDoctor_]

@Buuuddy thanks for letting me steal. <3

I think the worst part of the current system is that you receive a red 'closed' message instead of something less bad looking. Going off the original thread, this idea would probably make it a lot less discouraging or dissatisfying.

Reports that would otherwise be closed for 'already punished' will be moved to a separate reports queue, which appends to the regular queue. This means that if all reports are handled -and the active staff member has some spare time- they can review reports of already punished players. If the evidence is sufficient, it will be saved as additional evidence against the player, which can be extremely helpful for Sentinel bans, and a green 'Added' message will appear. If the evidence was insufficient, a red 'closed' message will appear.

 

[_The13thDoctor_]

@Rob_Was_Here Please explain why you said no.

 

[Earth]

I think the worst part of the current system is that you receive a red 'closed' message instead of something less bad looking. Going off the original thread, this idea would probably make it a lot less discouraging or dissatisfying.

Honestly, why do you/some people in general even care about this? You obviously report a player to get them punished, not to get as many g r e e n m e s s a g e s as possible? Just be glad they're banned? I mean, it's not like having a few ''''''''bad looking'''''''' closed message will influence your reputation or whatever in any way

 

[_The13thDoctor_]

Honestly, why do you/some people in general even care about this? You obviously report a player to get them punished, not to get as many g r e e n m e s s a g e s as possible? Just be glad they're banned? I mean, it's not like having a few ''''''''bad looking'''''''' closed message will influence your reputation or whatever in any way

I know a few red messages will not do any harm but why not have this implemented?

If you have additional evidence for someone banned by sentinel it will not only justify the ban but it will help staff members deal with the appeal process especially if the player claims they were not cheating. It's not just someone wanting to get "many g r e e n m e s s a g e s," It's just someone who wants to do really good for the server and it's assuring them that justice was done but they helped in the process.

 

[_The13thDoctor_]

@EGIIIIIIIIRL Please explain why you voted no.

 

[Elenahh]

@Rob_Was_Here Please explain why you said no.

@EGIIIIIIIIRL Please explain why you voted no.

They don't have to... If they have decided to just vote in the poll and not reply to this thread, respect their choice because that's what polls are for. I'm pretty sure that they would have explained if they actually wanted to.

And as for the suggestion, I support it because it will be very helpful for the Sentinel ban appealing process.

 

[user947836]

I think it would ineed be a nice idea to move the closed reports to another list, but I'm fine with the red closed text when a report gets denied.

 

[_The13thDoctor_]

They don't have to... If they have decided to just vote in the poll and not reply to this thread, respect their choice because that's what polls are for. I'm pretty sure that they would have explained if they actually wanted to.

And as for the suggestion, I support it because it will be very helpful for the Sentinel ban appealing process.

Actually, the whole point is they explain why the voted no. For all, I know there voting no on purpose.

 

[EGIIIIIIIIRL]

@EGIIIIIIIIRL Please explain why you voted no.

no im lazy

 

[_The13thDoctor_]

no im lazy

Fair enough. xD

 

[Siza]

got my vote

 

[Miiikee]

i think for 50/50%