Minecraft PC IP: play.cubecraft.net

MagnificentSpam

Forum Expert
Mar 16, 2016
2,306
2,239
298
Yes, taking off armor to save durability is really cheap and boring, and it kinda shows the player is plainly bad at pvp, having to win by using some bs strategy. I most definitely agree.
That doesn't really make sense to me. It wasn't intended to be that complicated, but conserving the armor doesn't make it easier. I remember fighting the great Communist Cactus himself with this kit and it was pretty close. After two games we both started to conserve armor and it did not become easier for either of us.

Please add the curse of binding, but as long as that is impossible because the sever is out of date, taking of the armor isn't a cheap strategy. If my opponent does I'd argue that it would even be arrogant not to. In that case I generally take of helmet and boots first, then after a while put both back on and take chestplate or leggings off, but not both at the same time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CommunistCactus

SpankMeSanta

Dedicated Member
Nov 12, 2016
848
1,367
153
35
Good idea. This kit is just about longer pvp so yes binding should be added.

Armour saving should only be in that kit with 2 sets of armour.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: CommunistCactus
Members Online

Latest profile posts

itz1anass wrote on Fesa's profile.
Best QA in the world!!
itz1anass wrote on Ahmdprogamer's profile.
Follow me😡
AliWarrior wrote on mrpeeveepee's profile.
Thanks for the follow!
Verbramdt wrote on a1sman's profile.
Thanks for the follow :D
NEWS: BEDWARS UPDATE HAS BEEN CONFIRMED!!!
Unfortunately, they have continued the trend of not sharing whats in it until it gets in testing. But also, <redacted> is back in development again
1787318834609.png
Top Bottom