Being able to lock your own thread.

[hgbf]

I agree with @PandaPlub , this would be nice. I do understand that it can be abused, but I think it got more positive than negative sides.

 

[BanBoy]

@PandaPlub threads are closed when a mod or helper or admin give the answer to the thread so why give the powr

 

[Pandaa]

@PandaPlub threads are closed when a mod or helper or admin give the answer to the thread so why give the powr

As @hgbf said there are more pros than cons. And it is the user's choice, sometimes the creator of the thread would request a lock from a helper and the helper would have to do it, now you can do it yourself, which saves time and effort ps: maybe there can be a message limit, like 30 messages required to lock thread

 

[guardd]

Laughing at people finding ways of how this could be abused. haha
+1 Good idea

 

[Orangeric88]

+1 for me :D This would come in handy. Sometimes I see people requesting for a thread lock but it never happens. But some cons would arise also. For example people that necroposte the thread is probally inactive so a staff would have to lock it. At that point, what's the point of having people lock it for themselves ;).

Anyways, I still like this idea dispite of the cons.:rolleyes: