Anti-Cheat Ban Messages

[Secret]

you would do us a favor, I think that people who only criticize and do not contribute should not be here.

Why you need to write with colours? Are you special or something?

 

[LuisHTX]

why not?

 

[DrHam]

Yes thats why I got banned because I did jitter clicking to 1 persson in the version 1.9

I dont see
I want to say something to you, go to the server and go to a game like FFA and jitter clicking to 1 persson and then we will talk. (1.9)

Butterfly/Drag clicking
Butterfly clicking is defined as using two or more fingers to click at once in order to boost your normal clicks per second. Drag clicking is defined as dragging your finger along the mouse button of a mechanical mouse or mapping your click button to your mouse wheel. Butterfly and drag clicking are both prohibited and may result in a Sentinel ban.

Yes, I know Jitterclick =/= Butterflyclick

 

[Secret]

JITTER CLICK not Butterfly/Drag clicking @HangarGeek

 

[Secret]

Yes, I know Jitterclick =/= Butterflyclick

 

[Luzario]

I got false banned from Sentinel twice and as you said I don't even know what I have been banned for. This needs to be added. +1

 

[Luzario]

Why you need to write with colours? Are you special or something?

Ikr, it triggers me.

 

[Zoutoplossing]

This isn't a thing, because hacked client creators can try to bypass it if they know what module is bannable.

 

[remio]

So, you have an anti-cheat that bans people, great. Now, false bans. People complain that it happens, it just happened to me. So we go ahead and appeal, say were not using hacks. You know what would make it easier? IF YOU TOLD US WHAT WE DID! Instead of saying "You were cheating" Say "You were banned for flying" So we can say why it may seem like that.

But moderators can't know what you did, because they can't look into the anticheat.

 

[Deleted member 169486]

But moderators can't know what you did, because they can't look into the anticheat.

But can't the anti-cheat say? I mean there's no way it just detects you hacking bans it has to defect some kind of hack to ban you for.

 

[remio]

But can't the anti-cheat say? I mean there's no way it just detects you hacking bans it has to defect some kind of hack to ban you for.

I know it's annoying, but I think only developers can look into the anticheat. (BTW I'm not sure)

 

[Deleted member 169486]

I know it's annoying, but I think only developers can look into the anticheat. (BTW I'm not sure)

OMG! The anti-cheat must detect you clicking really fast, bans for auto-clicker, "You have been banned for using an Auto-Clicker". Detects you moving with no blocks under you? "You have been banned for flying"

 

[remio]

OMG! The anti-cheat must detect you clicking really fast, bans for auto-clicker, "You have been banned for using an Auto-Clicker". Detects you moving with no blocks under you? "You have been banned for flying"

Yes, it's an automatic system.
That's why some players are unfair banned.

 

[Deleted member 169486]

Yes, it's an automatic system.
That's why some players are unfair banned.

I don't understand what you're missing here, but what I'm saying is, the anti-cheat will detect you doing something. Let's say it detects you running across the void, without blocks below you. Then instead of it saying "Banned by Anti-cheat" it would say "Banned by Anti-cheat For Flying" so people know what to say in an appeal.

 

[remio]

I don't understand what you're missing here, but what I'm saying is, the anti-cheat will detect you doing something. Let's say it detects you running across the void, without blocks below you. Then instead of it saying "Banned by Anti-cheat" it would say "Banned by Anti-cheat For Flying" so people know what to say in an appeal.

Ooooooh, now I get your point!
I think this is a good idea!

 

[AFreakingCookie (Hank)]

So, you have an anti-cheat that bans people, great. Now, false bans. People complain that it happens, it just happened to me. So we go ahead and appeal, say were not using hacks. You know what would make it easier? IF YOU TOLD US WHAT WE DID! Instead of saying "You were cheating" Say "You were banned for flying" So we can say why it may seem like that.

I ahree and feel like it should give a reason so that way it can help the appeal better. Example: if a player was banned for flying, flying doesnt work on cubecraft anymore (I havent tried oviously) or I just havent seen any fly hackers. Then it would be “I was just tnt jumping” because when ever I tnt jump and I lag back, I feel like I am about to be banned xD
+1

 

[Shifts]

So, you have an anti-cheat that bans people, great. Now, false bans. People complain that it happens, it just happened to me. So we go ahead and appeal, say were not using hacks. You know what would make it easier? IF YOU TOLD US WHAT WE DID! Instead of saying "You were cheating" Say "You were banned for flying" So we can say why it may seem like that.

Yehhh they shouldn't tell you what you got banned for it's so annoying how they don't tell you now