Higher Ranks get Higher privileges

[Spinnypoo]

Hi there,

I believe the more u spent the more you should get. I think this because... I think that it is unfair if you payed about $160 for a rank and got disadvantages and not actual advantages.

With the egg wars voting system:

1) If a Emerald votes for OP then one gold rank vote for HC, the Emerald wins
2) If there is a Obby (obsidian) rank that vote OP triple and a Emerald rank comes and vote against that clearly the Obby rank wins.
3) However if two gold ranks join a game and vote OP then the Emerald ranks votes normal items, I think that the Gold ranks should win.

So on and So on and so on...

Do you get what I mean?

 

[TheQueenWaddle]

I would much rather see a weighted points system.
But yes, I agree w/ the general idea.

 

[Thaus]

I mean, it wouldn't make it very fair for the gold ranked users
wouldn't it? There is always a small win percentage even if you
get outvoted. (At least that's what I heard before). I also think that
this is against the EULA. If you look at the EULA, ranks may NOT
give an advantage to ranked users but IDK if this would go under that.
Also, people who donate that $160 chose to pay for that amount. If they
could get that, they could have easily got the lesser ranks but they
decided to just get obsidian anyways. Basically, the people
decided to DONATE themselves. No one forced them to get the Obsidian
rank but they chose to. To add to that, Emeralds and Obsidians have
much more gadgets and abilities along with vanity items then the lower
ranks.

 

[Qin Shihuangdi]

I perfectly agree with the eggwars thing, but one emerald should still beat two gold. Three = Gold Win

 

[TheQueenWaddle]

I mean, it wouldn't make it very fair for the gold ranked users
wouldn't it? There is always a small win percentage even if you
get outvoted. (At least that's what I heard before). I also think that
this is against the EULA. If you look at the EULA, ranks may NOT
give an advantage to ranked users but IDK if this would go under that.
Also, people who donate that $160 chose to pay for that amount. If they
could get that, they could have easily got the lesser ranks but they
decided to just get obsidian anyways. Basically, the people
decided to DONATE themselves. No one forced them to get the Obsidian
rank but they chose to. To add to that, Emeralds and Obsidians have
much more gadgets and abilities along with vanity items then the lower
ranks.

It isn't against the EULA. There's no gameplay advantage, because everyone is stuck with the same items.
I want to stray away from the word "donate". "Donors" bought those privileges. Of course, I hope it was out of good intention, but if someone paid 160$ compared to 50$, they should have an advantage, no? You're a gold rank, so there's some bias. I'm a gold too, but I think that those who paid more for a higher rank do deserve that extra perk.

 

[Spinnypoo]

I mean, it wouldn't make it very fair for the gold ranked users
wouldn't it? There is always a small win percentage even if you
get outvoted. (At least that's what I heard before). I also think that
this is against the EULA. If you look at the EULA, ranks may NOT
give an advantage to ranked users but IDK if this would go under that.
Also, people who donate that $160 chose to pay for that amount. If they
could get that, they could have easily got the lesser ranks but they
decided to just get obsidian anyways. Basically, the people
decided to DONATE themselves. No one forced them to get the Obsidian
rank but they chose to. To add to that, Emeralds and Obsidians have
much more gadgets and abilities along with vanity items then the lower
ranks.

But if you think about it, CubeCraft have given gadgets to ranks cages to rank ETC, so really EULA?

 

[Spinnypoo]

I perfectly agree with the eggwars thing, but one emerald should still beat two gold. Three = Gold Win

 

[zSem_]

It wil be More unfair if you vote for triple Health and someone else (Emerald rank) vote for normal and Emerald rank wins. Why you should buy a rank then if you have 50 ℅ change to get your mode what you want

 

[Thaus]

It isn't against the EULA. There's no gameplay advantage, because everyone is stuck with the same items.
I want to stray away from the word "donate". "Donors" bought those privileges. Of course, I hope it was out of good intention, but if someone paid 160$ compared to 50$, they should have an advantage, no? You're a gold rank, so there's some bias. I'm a gold too, but I think that those who paid more for a higher rank do deserve that extra perk.

It's called a donation for a reason. They choose to buy it.
If this happened, people would stop buying gold ranks because of this.
Thanks for clarifying for that EULA cuz I wasnt too sure.

 

[Chimpeeze]

I dislike the idea purely because the majority of people buy a rank so they can vote on what they like to play. If higher ranks were given higher priority then it would just be a waste of time buying the lower ranks.

Some people can't afford or are unwilling to spend such a high amount of money on the higher ranks.

 

[Megaaa]

I don't support this idea. So what you are saying is if you are in a game with an Obsidian ranker and you are a Diamond ranker, you don't need to vote because you know you will lose. CubeCraft made the vote system so that every Gold+ (In eggwars) ranker can win with his vote. Or else it wouldn't be unfair, isn't it?

 

[Twisted_Wizard10]

I agree the higher the rank the more you should have as in cmds.

 

[TeamTyler]

Meh

 

[Buuuddy]

I don't like the fact that lower ranks have no chance of getting their preferred gamemode. This is not because I am a diamond rank myself, but because of it making it kinda unfair... What I think would be better is the following:
Whenever a diamond rank votes for 'Overpowered', 'Overpowered' will have 1 "point".
Whenever an emerald rank votes for 'Basic', 'Basic' will have 2 "points".
Whenever an obsidian rank vote for 'Normal', 'Normal' will have 3 "points".

So,

If an emerald rank votes for 'Basic' and a diamond rank votes for 'Normal', 'Basic' has a chance two thirds to be chosen while 'Normal' has a chance one third to be chosen.

If an diamond rank votes for 'Overpowered' and an obsidian rank votes for 'Normal', 'Overpowered' has a chance of one fourth to be chosen while 'Normal' has three fourths to be chosen.

If a diamond rank votes for 'Basic', an emerald rank votes for 'Normal' and an obsidian rank votes for 'Overpowered', 'Basic' has a chance of one sixth to be chosen, 'Normal' two sixths and 'Overpowered' three sixths

Writing out maths in English is hard ._.