I predict that if Cube really implements this feature you are suggesting, almost nobody wants to be a Party Leader anymore. Why? Because most people are too lazy to join a game in parties. I'm not saying that anybody is lazy here, but I know there are a lot of people out there who are and who use parties to be lazy and to do other stuff until they hear the sound of the starting game. Maybe I'm a simple person, but if you want to go AFK then just say it and leave the party or just go offline.
If you want a party that badly then you must communicate with each other and if someone is AFK suddenly then I have no mercy and I will kick them until I get a message that the player is back. I also just leave the party when the Party Leader suddenly decides to go AFK. That's the risk you take.
Let's not make the Party-System too complicated. I remember that Cube didn't have a Party-System at all. When you had to communicate even more to get your team into the game by saying: 3-2-1-GO. Sorry I won't support any form of those type of suggestions.
I totally understand your statement. It will make the system more difficult and maybe everyone in the party doesn't want to be the owner. But, if no one wants to be the owner, why does the party exist? There should be atleast one person creating the party, so that person has to be the owner. Also, Cube can make this system let's say Obsidian only? I think lots of people agree with the fact obsidian rank doesn't have a lot of perks, so this could be a feature right?
Also, laziness is indeed going to be a problem, I think. But whats wrong with being lazy? If you can join a party so you don't have to join games yourself and to have a good team (in your opinion), then whats wrong with that? You will still be playing the games right? Being AFK in the lobbies doesn't matter. If you want to be AFK for several games, I agree you should leave the party.
But yes, I do agree with you, although I think these problems can easily be resolved.
