All Networks Should first vote count

[Ijsbeerr]

I don't like this idea. Anyone who can vote has the right to vote, and if you join a little later, you should still get the chance to play your favorite pick.
Moreover, it is not random, there is a logic behind the vote.

 

[404Owl]

I definitely agree with this. It's so annoying sitting in the lobby for 20 mins only to have some lapis rank join when there are 10 seconds left and it becomes what they vote.

However, I can see that for some reason people think this is a bad idea. I can sort of understand why, because if you have chores or something you and you need to get on 5 minutes later you should still have a chance at what you voted.

I think a fair compromise would be to have the items selected by whoever voted first and the health can be selected by whoever voted last. Something like time of day could be randomized because in the end it doest really matter.

I've never had an experience of 12 hours in a cage wow.

hyperbole - noun - exaggerated statements or claims not meant to be taken literally

 

[GewoonThijn2006]

I think that it wouldn't be fair to the players that have a rank. If you vote something nobody votes it is still fair because everyone with a rank bought the perk to vote. I also don't think that higher ranks should have a higher chance at their vote then lower ranks. All these changes are not a good idea because it would make it unfair for the players who join in the last seconds. Its just not fair for any rank if it isn't randomized. It is called voting because it is democracy. thats why it is random because it wouldn't be fair. so that is why i don't agree with this thread.

 

[InkAsriel]

if first one counts, whats the point of voting if there's already a rank in game? this will only demotivate people from getting a rank is its worth a lot less. every vote should count as one and be based on either luck or most votes win, but not first vote wins