I like how the only peoples who voted for 
are the mods and ex mods
are the mods and ex mods
Minecraft PC IP: play.cubecraft.net
Hoshi
Speedy Wing Rush Gonzales
Reading this discussion, I started reconsidering my vote. I definitely didn’t think of the consequences it could have for the staff team. On the other hand, I still agree with Matriox’ point.
I may not know how the staff team works in certain situations anymore, due to me having been inactive for quite a long time after leaving the team, but I am pretty sure that I can say that just because all the (ex-)staff members voted disagree (which clearly isn’t true, unlike what one community member thought), doesn’t mean it isn’t a problem and that it shouldn’t be addressed. I solely voted agree because something has to be done against this.
What at least could be done is possibly adding a chat filter using the bot that filters certain links or scam message templates. These could be added to this filter manually after getting forwarded. This is only an idea, but it may be a better solution.
I want something done against this, but perhaps this suggestion isn’t the best idea, unlike what I originally thought. Therefore, I will change my vote to, even though I agree with both sides in a way.
I may not know how the staff team works in certain situations anymore, due to me having been inactive for quite a long time after leaving the team, but I am pretty sure that I can say that just because all the (ex-)staff members voted disagree (which clearly isn’t true, unlike what one community member thought), doesn’t mean it isn’t a problem and that it shouldn’t be addressed. I solely voted agree because something has to be done against this.
What at least could be done is possibly adding a chat filter using the bot that filters certain links or scam message templates. These could be added to this filter manually after getting forwarded. This is only an idea, but it may be a better solution.
I want something done against this, but perhaps this suggestion isn’t the best idea, unlike what I originally thought. Therefore, I will change my vote to
, even though I agree with both sides in a way.
Last edited:
Yeah, I agree with that. I think adding a chat filter will work. You've my agree!Reading this discussion, I started reconsidering my vote. I didn’t think of the consequences it could have for the staff team. On the other hand, I still agree with Matriox’ point.
I may not know how the staff team works in certain situations anymore, due to me having been inactive for quite a long time after leaving the team, but I am pretty sure that I can say that just because only the (ex-)staff members voted disagree (which clearly isn’t true, unlike what one community member thought), doesn’t mean it isn’t a problem and that it shouldn’t be addressed. I solely voted agree because something has to be done against this.
What at least could be done is possibly adding a chat filter using the bot that filters certain links or scam message templates. These could be added to this filter manually after getting forwarded. This is only an idea, but it may be a better solution.
I want something done against this, but perhaps this suggestion isn’t the best idea, unlike what I originally thought. Therefore, I will change my vote to
I already suggested the chat filter but ppl didn't agree with that either so here I am, I rather the chat filter option too but ppl don't agree
I’ll ask around in the team if this is a possibility for scam links.
Latest profile posts
jamesthesignificant wrote on Loskol's profile.
Loskol how do you feel about Duolingo using AI now?
Daily Question 124.
Has the forums got better or worse over your time being here?
Has the forums got better or worse over your time being here?
