1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Autoclickinq

Discussion in 'Suggestions' started by codexprivateㅤㅤㅤㅤ, Jun 4, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. codexprivateㅤㅤㅤㅤ

    codexprivateㅤㅤㅤㅤ Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2016
    Messages:
    895
    Likes Received:
    816
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Occupation:
    Love the life you live. Live the life you love.
    Location:
    α муѕтяισυѕ ρƖαcє
    hi c:

    So i have done some research and i think they should add a auto ban for autoclicking.

    Lets say on 20+ cps you get auto banned.
     
  2. They are already working on a new anti-cheat plug-in. And I don't think that people with hacks could reach 20 clicks per second. Especially when they use hacks for 1.9 PvP.
     
  3. skifbyfan101

    skifbyfan101 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2015
    Messages:
    6,524
    Likes Received:
    6,774
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Maybe just maybe I can reach 7 Clicks a second....
     
  4. SpookyHangar

    SpookyHangar Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2015
    Messages:
    2,991
    Likes Received:
    2,203
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Kepler452B
    Home Page:
    I reach 10-11CPS, I have a double-click button on my mouse :p
     
  5. codexprivateㅤㅤㅤㅤ

    codexprivateㅤㅤㅤㅤ Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2016
    Messages:
    895
    Likes Received:
    816
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Occupation:
    Love the life you live. Live the life you love.
    Location:
    α муѕтяισυѕ ρƖαcє
    They don't need to use hacks, they just might have an autoclicker installed to make it legit.
     
  6. Landviz

    Landviz Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2016
    Messages:
    1,186
    Likes Received:
    1,604
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    North pole
    Home Page:
    Some people can get 20 cps by butterflyclicking.. Also, people would just use an autoclicker with less cps.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.