Hard to explain read below!

[CubeCraftGod]

You should add a chance when a Obsidian votes, or a diamond or other ranks, that the highest rank should be the winner, I am Obsidian I vote for Op and normal and a Gold would vote for Hardcore and Normal health, then it does what he voted for, you should make a system that Obsidian gets the vote no matter what, only if 2 Emeralds or 4 diamonds votes something different. That would make it better for higher ranks to get what vote they want. Thank you for your team to read this!

 

[TheQueenWaddle]

Like weighted voting?
I agree.

 

[Power Ranger]

Would actually make it worth it to get a rank above diamond so I agree :D

 

[1212hawks_]

That would give the server more money actually. +1 :)

 

[Cyan]

I understand what you're trying to explain.
Sorry, but I don't support this. The voting system is completely random and I would like to keep it like that. I do also find it being somewhat bias.

 

[BlueMoon475]

I don't see how this is fair for us other donators though. We paid money just the same as you. We deserve the same voting rights.

 

[CubeCraftGod]

I have Obsidian rank, but golds are beating me to get the vote! Who agrees! Comment #RanksAboveShouldBeABOVE

 

[TheQueenWaddle]

Oh. Is that what it means?
I thought each donor got a point value of their vote.
So 2 Golds could still outvote an Obby.
Sorry.

 

[BlueMoon475]

Oh. Is that what it means?
I thought each donor got a point value of their vote.
So 2 Golds could still outvote an Obby.
Sorry.

He's saying that the highest donator voting would get what they want. So if an Obsidian voted for Normal and a Diamond voted for Basic, Obsidian would get what they voted for no matter what.

Obsidian > Lower Ranks

 

[Power Ranger]

He's saying that the highest donator voting would get what they want. So if an Obsidian voted for Normal and a Diamond voted for Basic, Obsidian would get what they voted for no matter what.

Obsidian > Lower Ranks

Oh I took it as obsidians get higher priority so an obby vote counts for maybe a 3x higher chance than a good but the gold can still win its just rare.

 

[TheQueenWaddle]

He's saying that the highest donator voting would get what they want. So if an Obsidian voted for Normal and a Diamond voted for Basic, Obsidian would get what they voted for no matter what.

Obsidian > Lower Ranks

I would support the idea if it was like
Obby=4 Votes
Emerald=3 Votes
Diamond=2 Votes
Gold=1 Vote

Or something like that. I would support something similar to the above.

 

[iDontPlayMinecraft.exe]

I have Obsidian rank, but golds are beating me to get the vote! Who agrees! Comment #RanksAboveShouldBeABOVE

I think there is a bug if you vote last 90% of time you will get what mode you wanted

 

[Brittley]

I don't think this is fair. Just because you paid more money, your money is more valuable than someone elses money they paid? I think the perks obby ranks get is amazing already. I personally don't think this is a good thing to change, but good suggestion.

 

[TheQueenWaddle]

I don't think this is fair. Just because you paid more money, your money is more valuable than someone elses money they paid? I think the perks obby ranks get is amazing already. I personally don't think this is a good thing to change, but good suggestion.

No... but they paid more of their equally valuable money. So they should have more privileges that don't give them an unfair in game advantage, right?
Diamond and Emerald perks are hardly any different. Obby is the same thing but just... more.
This would add a valuable extra perk these ranks are missing atm.

 

[maxminoS]

Keep in mind that it is called "donating" for a reason. Perks are just an incentive so that the server can keep running and get more money.

 

[Chimpeeze]

No support from me, if an obby ranked player was in the game then what would be the point in any other ranked players voting? You're obviously just having some bad luck with not getting what you voted for because I've seen plenty of occasions where lower ranked players have won the vote.

 

[Zombiepower]

No support for me because the server choose a random vote it can be yours or it can be a other vote... it is just the game who choose so no need to do higher ranks wins because it isn't fair for a lower rank

 

[Deleted member 112709]

Sure, why not.

 

[zRinne]

I don't agree with this.
Just because you have the higher paid rank doesn't give you more authority than the others.
It isn't fair to those who can not afford to give more than what they have compared to those who can.

Higher ranks get more stuff like gadgets and etc and I think even though it isn't much, it's still more than what the lower ranks have.
I think voting should stay the way it is.
Plans like this can backfire and cause players to not want to get ranks.

 

[Pandaa]

I don't agree with this.
Just because you have a higher rank doesn't mean you always win. It's supposed to go randomly, that's whats fun about it.

However,
Maybe to seperate Emerald from Obsidian *cough* because they're pretty much the same *cough* Is to maybe let Obsidian players have to vote points,