New Game Suggestion

[Younisco]

1: It´ll be hard to find 32 players willing to play the game I think. Maybe not in the beginnings but after a while.
2. Players might complain about randomly chosen teams.
3. Players might complain when their teams get splitt up. "All the good ones are in the other team now" -rage- -quit-
(Just my opinion. Not necessarily based on facts.)

All in all I don´t really see a difference to survival games. Yes in your suggestion there are actual teams but if you´d team up in survial games it would have pretty much the same effect. 12- 16 players spawn and they fight till 3 are left. Then it is 1v1v1.
Although I have to say it would remind me of a war. But for that I´d like two teams on two ends of a map. After a countdown everyone can start running to middle. In middle is then a huge battle. You could either splitt the winner team again afterwards or just leave it by that and the players in the winner team are the victors! That would be basically just killing each other but that is what war is... unnecessary killing.

1. We might start with 16 players, and if popularity is high, then we can obviously increase it accordingly.

2. Perhaps choosing teams? Or choosing teams based on skill? Like someone who is the best is the lobby is with the worst player in the lobby.

3. 2 answers this.

Survival games is mainly 1v1v1v1v1v1 (ECT.) whereas this is team based, with strategies and whatnot.

If it reminds you of war, then haven't you seen movies with war type things, like Prince Caspian or something? Because if you can handle this, and if you can handle in Survival Games (baring in mind that it is more similar to a war) the you'd be able to handle this. :33

 

[Saradabaschi]

If it reminds you of war, then haven't you seen movies with war type things, like Prince Caspian or something? Because if you can handle this, and if you can handle in Survival Games (baring in mind that it is more similar to a war) the you'd be able to handle this. :33

Nice last sentence Younis ;)

It might be fun. I´m not denying that. But I think it´d be just added as a special-season game like "Snow down". There is not really a season for a war-type-game but then just a random month.
Because we already have three fighting games: UHC, Skywars and Survival Games.

 

[Younisco]

Nice last sentence Younis ;)

It might be fun. I´m not denying that. But I think it´d be just added as a special-season game like "Snow down". There is not really a season for a war-type-game but then just a random month.
Because we already have three fighting games: UHC, Skywars and Survival Games.

This is pure PvP, UHC, Skywars and Survival games all has some type of disadvantage, UHC has no regeneration, Skywars is all chest-luck as well as Survival games. This is everyone having the same things.

 

[Sevenade78]

I think the main problem is the game would have to wait until it's on 16 players, so full. Because as Saradabaschi said before, Games with less players (let's say 15) would be 8v7 and if 7 wins 4v3 and so on and so on, and people would either complain about unfair teams or hackers (But that's in every game anyways)

I like the idea though, because you get to actually see who's the best in a bunch of people, other than survival games where you need a plan to get the good loot, or Skywars where it's more about the knockback. I like the idea about choosing a theme for all the arenas (Gold+/Diamond+ voting only I guess).

Anyways that's all I've got to say, all in all nice game, but maybe coming with some issues that could be easily fixed :D .

 

[marlutin]

There could also be like games for eight people, or four or just two

 

[marlutin]

And if there's sky wars maps that can have up to 24-32 players which normally get full, maps for 16 people would be ok

 

[Sevenade78]

And if there's sky wars maps that can have up to 24-32 players which normally get full, maps for 16 people would be ok

"Skywars" and "Some new game" have a big difference: Skywars is very popular on the Server and the new game won't be. Atleast not instantly.

 

[marlutin]

"Skywars" and "Some new game" have a big difference: Skywars is very popular on the Server and the new game won't be. Atleast not instantly.

Then the server will start with small matches and bigger matches will be added later

 

[Younisco]

Then the server will start with small matches and bigger matches will be added later

^ Exactly, we start with like 16 people and if needed, grow to 32. :3

 

[marlutin]

^ Exactly, we start with like 16 people and if needed, grow to 32. :3

I think it should start with 8, then 16 and then 32

 

[Sevenade78]

Who knows, the game needs a title first, any ideas Younis?

 

[Younisco]

Who knows, the game needs a title first, any ideas Younis?

Hmmmmm, I can't really come up with a viable bame, I'll need the most creative people I know (in many ways to list) @Aimee2323 @Tacosbefriends @Blooberry @noodles77

 

[Tacosbefriends]

Last One Standing? I dunno.

 

[Blooberry]

Fine then;

-Smackdown
-Faceoff
-Factored
-Halving
-The fabulous struggle for shiny loots
-Showdown
-Get Factored
-Royale

Well, that is all I got.

 

[Younisco]

Fine then;

-Smackdown
-Faceoff
-Factored
-Halving
-The fabulous struggle for shiny loots
-Showdown
-Get Factored
-Royale

Well, that is all I got.

I like the idea of Royale, thanks :3.

 

[Sevenade78]

Battle Royale would be cool :P

 

[_Patrickk]

3. Players might complain when their teams get splitt up. "All the good ones are in the other team now" -rage- -quit-
(Just my opinion. Not necessarily based on facts.)

Mix up players with lots of kills and not many, that should make it fair.

 

[MadGab210]

1: It´ll be hard to find 32 players willing to play the game I think. Maybe not in the beginnings but after a while.
2. Players might complain about randomly chosen teams.
3. Players might complain when their teams get splitt up. "All the good ones are in the other team now" -rage- -quit-
(Just my opinion. Not necessarily based on facts.)

All in all I don´t really see a difference to survival games. Yes in your suggestion there are actual teams but if you´d team up in survial games it would have pretty much the same effect. 12- 16 players spawn and they fight till 3 are left. Then it is 1v1v1.
Although I have to say it would remind me of a war. But for that I´d like two teams on two ends of a map. After a countdown everyone can start running to middle. In middle is then a huge battle. You could either splitt the winner team again afterwards or just leave it by that and the players in the winner team are the victors! That would be basically just killing each other but that is what war is... unnecessary killing.

I agree with Sara on all these things, and also, this game is not original. It is common among other servers by the different name. My friend who recently joined CCG used to play this game (which was even named team deathmatch) on another popular server. Maybe if the name was changed... I feel it would be better.

 

[Sophie]

I think the main problem is the game would have to wait until it's on 16 players, so full. Because as Saradabaschi said before, Games with less players (let's say 15) would be 8v7 and if 7 wins 4v3 and so on and so on, and people would either complain about unfair teams or hackers (But that's in every game anyways)

I like the idea though, because you get to actually see who's the best in a bunch of people, other than survival games where you need a plan to get the good loot, or Skywars where it's more about the knockback. I like the idea about choosing a theme for all the arenas (Gold+/Diamond+ voting only I guess).

Anyways that's all I've got to say, all in all nice game, but maybe coming with some issues that could be easily fixed :D .

That's very true. You will have to wait until the game is full for it to start, making the game harder to play before it's even out, otherwise you'll have unbalanced teams. 1v1, 2v2 and 3v3 could solve that, but it might make it too similar to UHC.

 

[Younisco]

I agree with Sara on all these things, and also, this game is not original. It is common among other servers by the different name. My friend who recently joined CCG used to play this game (which was even named team deathmatch) on another popular server. Maybe if the name was changed... I feel it would be better.

The winner of TDM is the team, this is one player, the undisputed best PvPer there.