Bedrock Targeting should be banable

[Frambooz]

I totally agree with targetting being annoying. I personally get targetted as well but come on, if you see someone that just got out of a fight that might become a threat, later on, you'd also just kill the player.

 

[InsaneOrbitzz]

I disagree

Why

 

[Story]

Or maybe just give the top 50 the ability to Nick.

I feel like everyone who disagrees only does because they target, you wouldn't be worried to argue against me unless you knew you were someone who targeted

Okay so because I disagree that means I target people? I just think my solution works perfectly fine, its also way easier, giving /nick to hundreds of leaderboard players is just not a good move, It'd cause lots of issues with moderation since the usernames dont match to their UUID and they are more likely to break the rules or stalk certain players, there are quite a lot of negative occurrences that occur from giving non-trusted users a /nick command.

 

[Technosword]

That's a bad view point imo. It's not a strategy at all its legit just annoying and ruins the game

It kind of is, I mean if you know someone is a threat then why not go for them if they have worse gear

 

[Slimeyz]

Okay so because I disagree that means I target people? I just think my solution works perfectly fine, its also way easier, giving /nick to hundreds of leaderboard players is just not a good move, It'd cause lots of issues with moderation since the usernames dont match to their UUID and they are more likely to break the rules or stalk certain players, there are quite a lot of negative occurrences that occur from giving non-trusted users a /nick command.

I had the same thoughts

 

[InsaneOrbitzz]

hmm

 

[InsaneOrbitzz]

I totally agree with targetting being annoying. I personally get targetted as well but come on, if you see someone that just got out of a fight that might become a threat, later on, you'd also just kill the player.

That's not what I mean when i mean Targeting

 

[InsaneOrbitzz]

Okay so because I disagree that means I target people? I just think my solution works perfectly fine, its also way easier, giving /nick to hundreds of leaderboard players is just not a good move, It'd cause lots of issues with moderation since the usernames dont match to their UUID and they are more likely to break the rules or stalk certain players, there are quite a lot of negative occurrences that occur from giving non-trusted users a /nick command.

If this doesn't affect you, you wouldn't be defending it

 

[InsaneOrbitzz]

It kind of is, I mean if you know someone is a threat then why not go for them if they have worse gear

I said for the name etc

 

[Story]

If this doesn't affect you, you wouldn't be defending it

I dont need to be a targeter or a leaderboard player to give my opinion on this, I've read the post and I understand what you're asking. I'm giving a different perspective, I think you should take it into consideration not being deflective.

 

[Pcddle]

Yeah, but all of what you said still doesn’t give a proper reason to ban people. I don’t have time to really quote every single message but you think it would really affect your gameplay if people target?

 

[Pineapple]

Honestly when I’m in a game with someone who I know is a pro I try to go for them quickly if at all possible because it’s easier to get the strong first when they don’t have the best stuff janitoring them after a fight so I know my odds of winning have greatly increased

 

[Salty_Shadows]

I disagree

I disagree as well access to /nick for people who aren't staff or are supposed to have it is pointless as it could lead to innap names or just spammy names