All Networks /p might give an unfair advantage

[𝖜𝓲𝓲ʞєŋɖ]

Hello there,
Lately I watched a vid from a Hypixel youtuber, who used /p add on someone, then joined another game and took that person with him, and then his friend won. I wondered if that also actually worked on CubeCraft, so me and a friend joined the same game in SkyWars (we did not team, just joined the same game, what is not against the rules). Then, when just 2 guys were left, one of us partied one of the final two guys left, and then left the game, so the last person wins.
This is just stupid, we thought, because, when some people party, you can just party invite one of the last guys, so your friend wins. Especially with newer players this would just give an unfair advantage.
Thats why I'm asking if you guys can remove that from the game. So when you use /p, you can't leave the game as long as some people in your party are still alive.

Have a nice day,
Wiikend

 

[Sweetenerera]

I do think you should be able to leave because sometimes your party agrees on leaving. I'd perfer a message in the chat you have to click on to agree on leaving.

Question, which YouTuber/video was it?

 

[CraftCreatures]

I am not sure about this one. Whenever I am still alive in a game and get a party invite, I won’t accept it yet until I lost/won the game. However, newer player don’t know about this. Maybe they can add a warning that if the party-owner leaves, the player will automatically leave too.

 

[𝖜𝓲𝓲ʞєŋɖ]

I do think you should be able to leave because sometimes your party agrees on leaving. I'd perfer a message in the chat you have to click on to agree on leaving.

Question, which YouTuber/video was it?

A hypixel youtuber. Actually forgot which one it was. But they did it because there was a hacker. I think Bitzel..?

 

[𝖜𝓲𝓲ʞєŋɖ]

I am not sure about this one. Whenever I am still alive in a game and get a party invite, I won’t accept it yet until I lost/won the game. However, newer player don’t know about this. Maybe they can add a warning that if the party-owner leaves, the player will automatically leave too.

I think that is a good one

 

[Sweetenerera]

A hypixel youtuber. Actually forgot which one it was. But they did it because there was a hacker. I think Bitzel..?

Ah, I think it was Skeppy then. Could that be correct?

Maybe they can add a warning that if the party-owner leaves, the player will automatically leave too.

Do you mean the party-owner will get the message? or the players? Giving players a message is a good idea, but I still think that the player should accept going to the hub.

 

[𝖜𝓲𝓲ʞєŋɖ]

Ah, I think it was Skeppy then. Could that be correct?


Do you mean the party-owner will get the message? or the players? Giving players a message is a good idea, but I still think that the player should accept going to the hub.

Not Skeppy I think. It can be he did that too, but not the one I mean rn.

 

[CraftCreatures]

Do you mean the party-owner will get the message? or the players? Giving players a message is a good idea, but I still think that the player should accept going to the hub.

Probably the player who is still in the game, because the owner is probably in the lobby.

 

[𝖜𝓲𝓲ʞєŋɖ]

Probably the player who is still in the game, because the owner is probably in the lobby.

The owner already gets a message. The one in game doesn't get any message or hint. If the party owner leaves to the lobby he takes the player with him.

 

[CraftCreatures]

The owner already gets a message. The one in game doesn't get any message or hint. If the party owner leaves to the lobby he takes the player with him.

Yes I know that :p The player should get a message too if he decides to join the party.

 

[ElAstronauta]

It’s quite the unfair advantage there, however, consider the following scenario: A content creator is live and would love to play with their subscribers on CCG via party; furthermore, they joined a SkyWars game and some of the players from the game are still alive, but one of the players from the party is hiding or trying to prolong the game to piss the content creator. The content creator and the players in the party have to suffer the actions of that player and have to wait until they die to join another game or they could just kick them from the party. Maybe adding @CraftCreatures option to the party system would be a great add-on.

 

[𝖜𝓲𝓲ʞєŋɖ]

It’s quite the unfair advantage there, however, consider the following scenario: A content creator is live and would love to play with their subscribers on CCG via party; furthermore, they joined a SkyWars game and some of the players from the game are still alive, but one of the players from the party is hiding or trying to prolong the game to piss the content creator. The content creator and the players in the party have to suffer the actions of that player and have to wait until they die to join another game or they could just kick them from the party. Maybe adding @CraftCreatures option to the party system would be a great add-on.

But if that is the case, you can just kick the player the content creator is pissed by, or make this only available to bigger content creators because they (probably) don't abuse it.

 

[Vumby]

Today I played some tower defense with some friends in a party, but the party owner got afk kicked and he took all of us to the lobby which seems pretty unfair. So i agree with this.

 

[Nutuu]

I disagree. Why to join the party during the game if you know the player who invited you is dead?

 

[𝖜𝓲𝓲ʞєŋɖ]

I disagree. Why to join the party during the game if you know the player who invited you is dead?

Well, I did and some people fell for it. And what if you're with 3 people, of whom 2 are in a party. You leave the party, invite the other last person and let you're original party member win by leaving.

 

[Nutuu]

Well, I did and some people fell for it. And what if you're with 3 people, of whom 2 are in a party. You leave the party, invite the other last person and let you're original party member win by leaving.

The question is, why would you do that?