So this suggestion may have been suggested before, so pls no hate, I just want to reopen the discussion.
So, although i'd like to hear everybody's opinion (of course), this suggestion is useless w/o the backup of our good friends @Tacosbefriends / @Mac .
Now, lets get to the actual suggestion:
We all know that to successfully report and ban a hacker you must include video evidence.
Great.
However, lets look at the facts:
A fly hacker is as easily reported with a screen-shot as with video evidence.
I mean, seriously.
Its completely obvious and easily identifiable as fly hacks with a screen-shot.
And, with this change added, there would probably be hardly a single fly hacker.
All the reasons most people don't report right now would be completely void.
I can't see a reason not to make this change, but I'm sure you guys will find plenty.
Let me know what you think!
So, although i'd like to hear everybody's opinion (of course), this suggestion is useless w/o the backup of our good friends @Tacosbefriends / @Mac .
Now, lets get to the actual suggestion:
We all know that to successfully report and ban a hacker you must include video evidence.
Great.
However, lets look at the facts:
A fly hacker is as easily reported with a screen-shot as with video evidence.
I mean, seriously.
Its completely obvious and easily identifiable as fly hacks with a screen-shot.
And, with this change added, there would probably be hardly a single fly hacker.
All the reasons most people don't report right now would be completely void.
I can't see a reason not to make this change, but I'm sure you guys will find plenty.
Let me know what you think!