Hello
I'd like to know why staff members don't need evidence when banning someone. I get why they dont if the reason is clear but that wasn't my case when I got banned recently. It is true that i ended up getting unbanned but i still paid for a mod's mistake once again. It concerns me that some mods say that they are human and they can make mistakes but also they dont need evidence when punishing someone which is contradictive, don't you think? By letting staff members banning people without having a way to prove it I understand you expect them not to make them. Besides, how is the person punished supposed to prove it was an unfair ban? If it's a staff member's word against a normal player's, you are obviously gonna believe the staff, am I right? (i spelled concerns wrong in the title my bad)
I'd like to know why staff members don't need evidence when banning someone. I get why they dont if the reason is clear but that wasn't my case when I got banned recently. It is true that i ended up getting unbanned but i still paid for a mod's mistake once again. It concerns me that some mods say that they are human and they can make mistakes but also they dont need evidence when punishing someone which is contradictive, don't you think? By letting staff members banning people without having a way to prove it I understand you expect them not to make them. Besides, how is the person punished supposed to prove it was an unfair ban? If it's a staff member's word against a normal player's, you are obviously gonna believe the staff, am I right? (i spelled concerns wrong in the title my bad)