Minecraft PC IP: play.cubecraft.net
Stan J.K. Rowling! <3's latest activity
-
Stan J.K. Rowling! <3 replied to the thread All Networks [Controversial] Set the minimum Staff age to 16-17 OR periodical controls.Which is exactly why I suggested this lol -
Stan J.K. Rowling! <3 reacted to Joe🍩's post in the thread All Networks [Controversial] Set the minimum Staff age to 16-17 OR periodical controls with
Like.
Nooo,I disagree it! Because i now just 14 years old,if the minimum age changed to be 17 years old,then i must wait 3 years more :( -
Stan J.K. Rowling! <3 replied to the thread All Networks [Controversial] Set the minimum Staff age to 16-17 OR periodical controls.Let's think of x-person with good knowledge of the rules, but at the same time, x-person does not like to report everyone for every...
-
Stan J.K. Rowling! <3 reacted to Deleted member 347571's post in the thread All Networks [Controversial] Set the minimum Staff age to 16-17 OR periodical controls with Like.
Nowadays people care more about the rank than actually helping people, but i do agree with what Priley has said above me. You have to...
-
Stan J.K. Rowling! <3 reacted to Priley's post in the thread All Networks [Controversial] Set the minimum Staff age to 16-17 OR periodical controls with Like.
When I use the term 'minor', I'm referring to 14-year-olds It is true that age doesn't automatically define someone's maturity, but...
-
Stan J.K. Rowling! <3 replied to the thread All Networks [Controversial] Set the minimum Staff age to 16-17 OR periodical controls.yeah and in that case, part 2 of my suggestion would fit very well: checking on staff members every once in a while, especially if...
-
Stan J.K. Rowling! <3 replied to the thread All Networks [Controversial] Set the minimum Staff age to 16-17 OR periodical controls.And, of course, *always* agreeing with admins :)
-
Stan J.K. Rowling! <3 replied to the thread Discord Make sure there is a screenshot of evidence when muted/kicked/banned from the Discord.I got banned a few days for swearing, but I literally have no idea what for lmao
-
Stan J.K. Rowling! <3 reacted to Goefy's post in the thread All Networks [Controversial] Set the minimum Staff age to 16-17 OR periodical controls with Like.
Lmao this is kinda true. Snitching+backstabbing=promotion :banter:
-
Stan J.K. Rowling! <3 updated their status.
-
Stan J.K. Rowling! <3 replied to the thread All Networks [Controversial] Set the minimum Staff age to 16-17 OR periodical controls.Forum posts are irrelevant to the maturity of x person. Just like having reported 50 people on the website. They're recruiting snitches lmao
-
Stan J.K. Rowling! <3 replied to the thread Discord Make sure there is a screenshot of evidence when muted/kicked/banned from the Discord.pander more
-
Stan J.K. Rowling! <3 posted the thread All Networks [Controversial] Set the minimum Staff age to 16-17 OR periodical controls in Feedback & Suggestions.Hi, I'm not the only one who has seen, and argued about, ~16 year old Moderators or Helpers who fulfill their "duties" as Staff in a...
-
-
Stan J.K. Rowling! <3 posted the thread Discord Make sure there is a screenshot of evidence when muted/kicked/banned from the Discord in Feedback & Suggestions.Title explains it. Asked for a screenshot of me swearing to the staff member who banned me, @Catss, and got a snarky response in...
-
-
Sup, I feel like I'm way too active on this forum. But could anyone hmu with a reason why I got banned from the Discord? Discord: yip#9383
