So here's an idea.
So add a new kit to miner, builder, healer etc called anti drag kit. You get 2 fire balls, a bow, and 5 arrows on spawn.
Empty for King.
Pro W will also love this suggestion.
Perhaps extend to 100 then instead of 50, or maybe even split the top 10 say or even top 20 into a premier leader board, a bit like how English Football leagues work, that way players who want to achieve can do it and doesn't take away from the players who grind a lot. Btw only a very few names...
If you want to be on a LB, just do what everyone else did, play hard, win, and get there. Imo introducing seasonal or monthly LB discredits the whole point.
For me, UK player, it's been from around 4pm, 80% queued into NA. Maybe CC don't pay their server bills for EU servers after this point to save money ?
This would require everyone to record every game, all of the time, to ensure the correct moment is clipped. Making a video showing drag or butterfly after a ban, not relating to that moment, simply isn't evidence.
Well it can't be punished simply as it's allowable. The wider issue is that auto and macro is often appealed by saying its drag, and the Mod team can't tell it apart because they don't play enough or understand the difference. So unless that changes, the only solution is to remove it, which is...
But ! Your suggesting banning one thing I.e. drag to remove another I.e cheating. We are all missing the point ! This is like burning down a house because one room has a rat in it
Think you've missed the point there......the point is people can use macro and auto and get banned, then simply say I'm a drag clicker and get unbanned
The truth is that these hack clients are far more advanced than the current sentinel and it would take so much development time to constantly update it. IMO these blatant hackers do get caught and banned in the end, or they get bored and leave as it was just some fun for them. They don't...
With respect, I feel it's more "when it suits". You can't have a subjective punishment like this without clear guidance on how a decision would be arrived at and what the criteria is. Otherwise it's simply an opinion that somebody shouldn't be allowed to play. In this example, if 14 times the...
So I'll give an example. A player gets reported 15 times and 14 times out of 15 the exact same Mod team agree that they were not cheating in any way. Then they get banned for not being a good fit. How is that correct ?
Since when do people get banned based on the above opinion ? No facts, zero evidence. It's wrong. And I believe I have evidence to suggest and prove why.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.