Genuinely, lol. Somebody asked me to cite my argument earlier. I provided a book reference - as per their exact request - but apparently I forgot that a book published by Vintage, authored by a geneticist, is not valid. How about the NHS? Nope. NIH? Nope. WHO? Still no. ICD-11? Nah.
I'm sure it's just a coincidence that whatever source I give them is invalid for some reason.
I remember watching a Flat Earther vs. Scientist video that my cousin sent me, and I could not stop laughing when the flat earther said:
- The scientist was brainwashed to believe that the shape of Earth was a globe.
- The reason why the Earth's curvature is seen at high altitudes is that the cameras used are fisheye lenses.
Whenever the scientist would speak anything that is backed up with facts and evidence, they'd interrupt and say "WELL WHAT ABOUT THIS RANDOM NITPICK?"
Genuinely no hope for these people, Darwinism will take its course (if they believe in Darwinism, Kappa)
In my argument yesterday, they fell back on the claim that "science has been wrong before, and can definitely be wrong again!" They used thalidomide as an example.
I guess we should take generic-internet-idiot's word on this subject they clearly do not understand then, because the entire medical and genetic community *might* be wrong about something they've researched their entire lives.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.