The title of this thread sort of says what's on my mind. But if you aren't thinking straight, I'm suggesting we have top winners for more games like Parkour Minigame or SuperCraftBros. The reward could be points or a free rank-up. Also UHC. Maybe every time you win, you are rewarded 50 points or whatever.
If we have top winners for more games and if these top winners win donator ranks, well then, there are just going to be to many donators. Also skywars and survival games are the main 2 games with the most amount of players on it.
Right; 1) Troy-Quill is right, if CCG gives away ranks for all the games, every month then we will end up with more donators than stones which could mean less people donate 2) I believe points and ranks are given away based on the popularity of the game. Less people play SCB so it's easier to get ranks/points whereas there must be Hundreds of Skywars Matches per month so winning is harder. Example; 100 SCB matches (3 players are chosen per month from those players) | 2000 Skywars Matches (3 people are chosen) Just to note, I know those stats are way off, it's just an example 3) With the UUID updates, EULA & other problems, I don't know if you have noticed but not even Skywars winners have been given ranks for a month (maybe 2) so I think the question we should be asking is, will CCG be giving away free ranks in the future for being the best at skywars or SG? 4) I think there have been a few threads on this already.
If there isn't a Game on there it's cause it didn't get any votes. This should give you a better picture to the popularity of games
I think there should be a reward for UHC because this game does take a fair while to play and possibly win, so I was thinking 30 points split up between the players left on the winning team.
I think the leaderboards for other games shouldn't give away ranks but perhaps just points. but primarily that's why people play more skywars and survival games than others, because they have leaderboards and they want to get on them.
I think people play them cause they are more fun and more people play them, circle = More people = more people to play with so more people to play with. + they are probably find them more fun
To be totally honest, I only ever play Skywars for quick points or because a friend dragged me along into a game. Otherwise I stick to Hide & Seek, Super Craft Bros, and Paintball (and occasionally Fish Slap and TNT Run)
Sorry about the double-post but I would love it if UHC got donor ranks/points every month. (It's the only competitive game I'm good at)
Individual players don't win the game, your team wins, the team wins.mIn other games only one player can win (except paintball but I doubt ranks will be given for tht) so it's clear who is good at the game. UHC you could have a group of good people and get luckey
To be fair, in all the other games you could just hide and wait for everyone else to die, then wait for the other person to quit/suicide. By that argument, you should only get a victory if you yourself kill every single player in the game. UHC's a popular game and it really wouldn't be a huge deal to give out 1-4 wins per round instead of just 1 win. It generally takes longer than skywars or survival games, so it'd make sense for several people to be able to get a victory instead of only 1.
I think it players should get points for being on the winning team but I don't think they should get a rank if they have won a certain amount of matches
