Scrutiny to punishments.

Discussion in 'Suggestions' started by Younisco, Apr 1, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Younisco

    Younisco Sr. Mod Staff Member Sr. Moderator

    Messages:
    7,383
    Likes Received:
    11,795
    Trophy Points:
    549
    Younisco
    Sr. Mod
    Hello everyone, I am here to suggest a thing that could clear up some of the chat stuff that is said in game.

    Because there have been a lot more reports (although it's more hackers than muting), I believe a scrutiny in punishments should be implemented.

    1st chat warning : 2 weeks mute.

    2nd chat warning : 1 month mute.

    3rd chat warning : 4 months mute.

    4th chat warning : 12 months mute.

    Advertising ; to be kept at forever.

    What moderators (and players before they report) would need to do is this; they need to wait a good 5-10 minutes before muting/reporting incase they cause more havoc / could get a longer mute. If you have been waiting for more than 10 minutes, proceed to mute/report.
     
    Eclipse1314 likes this.
  2. Aimee2323

    Aimee2323 Member

    Messages:
    7,269
    Likes Received:
    5,174
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ehh no I prefer just muting them how I do now, muting after two warnings or so rather than "seeing if they create more havoc", it just creates more havoc, and the mute system is fine how it is


    (Also you want advertising to be a forever mute still? Can be arranged ;) )
     
    kkbubble and Sophie like this.
  3. Younisco

    Younisco Sr. Mod Staff Member Sr. Moderator

    Messages:
    7,383
    Likes Received:
    11,795
    Trophy Points:
    549
    Younisco
    Sr. Mod
    ;-; Nu
     
    guardd and Aimee2323 like this.
  4. Sophie

    Sophie Member

    Messages:
    8,621
    Likes Received:
    13,634
    Trophy Points:
    549
    Divine_Nyx
    Diamond
    I think this might unnecessarily over-complicate the simple "warning, warning, mute" system that we have at the moment.
     
    kkbubble likes this.
  5. Achelois

    Achelois Member

    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    108
    Trophy Points:
    33
    I thought it was 3 warnings what
     
  6. Volkom_

    Volkom_ Member

    Messages:
    1,399
    Likes Received:
    1,531
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Each staff member has their own different way of dealing with it, I give it 3 warnings and then 3 months depending on what it is. If its racism or advertising its permanent for me
     
  7. Hallucinated

    Hallucinated Member

    Messages:
    1,644
    Likes Received:
    1,303
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm usually very strict about my warnings, I believe only 1 warning is needed, if they don't stop after their first warning then I'll mute them accordingly to what they have done.
     
  8. Tomve_Matz

    Tomve_Matz Member

    Messages:
    291
    Likes Received:
    202
    Trophy Points:
    43
    I don't like it because one of the banned words oon cubecraft is espera (=wait) but is a banned word becuase it contains es-pera --> pera+r=Perra=Swearing word. So if people speaking spanish says wait often they can get muted by the system
     
  9. Colourlight

    Colourlight Member

    Messages:
    2,157
    Likes Received:
    486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think it should just be kept as it is.
     
  10. Younisco

    Younisco Sr. Mod Staff Member Sr. Moderator

    Messages:
    7,383
    Likes Received:
    11,795
    Trophy Points:
    549
    Younisco
    Sr. Mod
    Okay someone may lock.
     
  11. Pingu_

    Pingu_ Member

    Messages:
    1,015
    Likes Received:
    756
    Trophy Points:
    143
    if staff members have to give warnings out, after the 4th warning (12 months = 1 year = That is a long time) staff cannot keep track of all the players they have dished out warnings too. There are like 15 thousand people (again, that is a LOT) playing Cuberaftgames and do you think EVERY mod/admin can keep track of how many people they have warned
     
  12. marlutin

    marlutin Member

    Messages:
    549
    Likes Received:
    66
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Also, the anti-swear sustem has a spelling problem, pera means pear, the correct word to ban would be perra, which I believe is not banned.
     
  13. Volkom_

    Volkom_ Member

    Messages:
    1,399
    Likes Received:
    1,531
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's because people mask swear words, in English the point can get across if you drop one letter. Apparently this isn't the case in other languages, although depending on the contex it may make sense :p
     
  14. Oceanical

    Oceanical Member

    Messages:
    4,651
    Likes Received:
    2,291
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nah, this would just overcomplicate things. Most staff members have their own way, the way I do it is 2 warnings, then a mute. Racism and advertising of IPs are instant perm mutes. Easy as that. We don't need a whole template and rubric for it.
     
    Younisco and Eclipse1314 like this.
  15. Aimee2323

    Aimee2323 Member

    Messages:
    7,269
    Likes Received:
    5,174
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Locked.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.