Minecraft PC IP: play.cubecraft.net

Kjev

Novice Member
Mar 6, 2018
34
40
34
19
The Netherlands
upload_2019-12-12_9-59-29.png

Well atleast he got banned before you posted this ;) (by the anticheat)
 
D

Deleted member 112709

Guest
Has evidence of one player cheating and not getting banned immediately
BAD ANTICHEAT
If I were to record every player that is cheating blatantly (and doesn't get banned instantly) in each game I play my external hard drive would be full in 1 day.
This anticheat is bad, if you say otherwise you just make yourself look dumb.

View attachment 157933
Well atleast he got banned before you posted this ;) (by the anticheat)
Point is that if you use such blatant cheats (that actually alter gameplay in terms of movement speed and reach) it should be detected near instantly.
 

Keanu

Forum Veteran
Jan 5, 2017
2,879
10,795
524
20
Maastricht, the Netherlands
youtu.be
Point is that if you use such blatant cheats (that actually alter gameplay in terms of movement speed and reach) it should be detected near instantly.
Did you actually do research and looked into it before saying false things?
upload_2019-12-12_16-37-41.png

Like you can see on the screen, they work with ban waves; not with instant banning. Maybe it got detected right away, but didn't get banned right away because there just was a ban wave.
 
  • Like
Reactions: remio
D

Deleted member 112709

Guest
Did you actually do research and looked into it before saying false things?
View attachment 157958
Like you can see on the screen, they work with ban waves; not with instant banning. Maybe it got detected right away, but didn't get banned right away because there just was a ban wave.
I guess I'd better ask you whether you do research or not.
Quoted from the "Sentinel Update" thread:
"Moreover, we believe that when Sentinel detects a cheater, they should be removed from the network instantly."

And even if they ban through waves, that is not helping much either. It also makes no sense. All they do is allowing cheaters longer on the network, ruining the fun of other players. It doesn't help to prevent bypasses either (an often used argument to ban through waves).
 

Keanu

Forum Veteran
Jan 5, 2017
2,879
10,795
524
20
Maastricht, the Netherlands
youtu.be
I guess I'd better ask you whether you do research or not.
Quoted from the "Sentinel Update" thread:
"Moreover, we believe that when Sentinel detects a cheater, they should be removed from the network instantly."
Believing =/= Reality.


And even if they ban through waves, that is not helping much either. It also makes no sense. All they do is allowing cheaters longer on the network, ruining the fun of other players. It doesn't help to prevent bypasses either (an often used argument to ban through waves).
then make a suggestion instead of an other rant thread. The fact remains that Sentinel bans in waves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpringWarz

ir32f

Member
Dec 13, 2019
15
8
4
20
Believing =/= Reality.



then make a suggestion instead of an other rant thread. The fact remains that Sentinel bans in waves.
You dont know how sentinel works. If something doesnt bypass, you will get instantly banned, not banwaved. For example, if you use a scaffold that doesnt bypass, you will get banned instantly
 
D

Deleted member 112709

Guest
You dont know how sentinel works. If something doesnt bypass, you will get instantly banned, not banwaved. For example, if you use a scaffold that doesnt bypass, you will get banned instantly
Better not waste your time on these kind of people. It is clear that this is one of the worst anticheats out there - people on the forums just tend to defend it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

ir32f

Member
Dec 13, 2019
15
8
4
20
More than a million bans server-wide, but yet a bad anticheat?
Its literally the same hackers that use alts and a bad client, so ofc they are gona get banned over and over again. Also, sentinel sometimes double bans and it may false ban

More than a million bans server-wide, but yet a bad anticheat?
btw I was cheating for 3+ hours on an alt yesterday, and i didnt get banned by sentinel
 
Last edited by a moderator:

remio

Forum Professional
Sep 18, 2016
5,619
17,064
689
The Netherlands
www.youtube.com
Almost 1.5 million.Be correct*
It says MORE than a million for a reason.
Its literally the same hackers that use alts and a bad client, so ofc they are gona get banned over and over again. Also, sentinel sometimes double bans and it may false ban
Of course people with a less advanced client are gonna be banned faster than people with a more advanced client, but the point is that clients develop fast, so Sentinel needs to catch up in some way. But catching up with the clients isn't easy at all, meaning that the devs are going to need some time to block certain bypasses. You can't call an anticheat 'bad' just because clients develop fast.
 

ir32f

Member
Dec 13, 2019
15
8
4
20
It says MORE than a million for a reason.

Of course people with a less advanced client are gonna be banned faster than people with a more advanced client, but the point is that clients develop fast, so Sentinel needs to catch up in some way. But catching up with the clients isn't easy at all, meaning that the devs are going to need some time to block certain bypasses. You can't call an anticheat 'bad' just because clients develop fast.
You realize that sentinel hasnt been updated in a long time and the client im using is over 2 years old and its still fully bypassing sentinel, you have no idea of what your talking about dude. Even wurst is bypassing sentinel, so in conclusion, sentinel is a bad anticheat. Even ncp is better than that garbage anticheat
 
D

Deleted member 112709

Guest
More than a million bans server-wide, but yet a bad anticheat?
Those numbers say nothing to me if you look at all the bypasses for this anticheat.
Of course people with a less advanced client are gonna be banned faster than people with a more advanced client, but the point is that clients develop fast, so Sentinel needs to catch up in some way. But catching up with the clients isn't easy at all, meaning that the devs are going to need some time to block certain bypasses. You can't call an anticheat 'bad' just because clients develop fast.
It's not that clients develop fast, or that devs "need some time" to block certain bypasses. They are just incapable in coding a good anticheat.
 

Marieke2001

Forum Professional
Jul 2, 2015
4,115
15,519
679
You dont know how sentinel works. If something doesnt bypass, you will get instantly banned, not banwaved. For example, if you use a scaffold that doesnt bypass, you will get banned instantly
You also don’t know how sentinel works. Some cheats have instant ban when detected, some have banwaves. You both right
 
  • Like
Reactions: Keanu and remio

Eli

Forum Veteran
Dec 25, 2017
1,312
6,775
408
18
Bogota, Colombia
Those numbers say nothing to me if you look at all the bypasses for this anticheat.

It's not that clients develop fast, or that devs "need some time" to block certain bypasses. They are just incapable in coding a good anticheat.
Over and over again do I see the same threads about sentinel not being a “good” anti cheat. But fact remains, no one ever explains what a good anti cheat is? How can you expect change if you only judge and criticize but not provide any solutions? That’s the biggest problem, people just complain over and over again but never propose something.

The devs may be “incapable” of making a “good” anti cheat (whatever that’s supposed to mean), but you’re incapable of making a good suggestion?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marieke2001
D

Deleted member 112709

Guest
Over and over again do I see the same threads about sentinel not being a “good” anti cheat. But fact remains, no one ever explains what a good anti cheat is? How can you expect change if you only judge and criticize but not provide any solutions? That’s the biggest problem, people just complain over and over again but never propose something.

The devs may be “incapable” of making a “good” anti cheat (whatever that’s supposed to mean), but you’re incapable of making a good suggestion?
I'm not a developer of CubeCraft so it's not my job to provide solutions to fix problems with their anticheat. That's their job. However, that does not mean I can't complain about their garbage anticheat.
 
Members Online

Latest profile posts

Xi1m wrote on katnip's profile.
i absolutely love that profile picture
Eli
Where's the second member? 🤔

1713925281107.png
someone make a rivals of aether mod with fhg characters

it's the closest we can get to an official game
CubeT0ch wrote on savina875's profile.
Thanks for the follow to I guess.
Top Bottom